FINAL AGENDA
4:00 P.M. MEETING
Individual Items on the 4:00 p.m. meeting agenda may be postponed to the 6:00 p.m. meeting.
|
1. | CALL TO ORDER
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3). |
|||||||||
2. | ROLL CALL
|
|||||||||
3. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MISSION STATEMENT
MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the City of Flagstaff is to protect and enhance the quality of life of its citizens. |
|||||||||
4. | APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS | |||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Minutes: City Council Special Work Session of October 19, 2015; City Council Work Session of October 27, 2015; and City Council Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015. | |||||||||
5. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak. |
|||||||||
6. | PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS |
|||||||||
7. | APPOINTMENTS Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for the purpose of discussing or considering employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee, or employee of any public body...., pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1). |
|||||||||
8. | LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARINGS | |||||||||
A. |
Consideration and Action on Liquor License Application: Roger Burton, “Giant #084", 1010 N. Country Club Dr, Series 10 (beer and wine store), New License.
|
|||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Hold the Public Hearing; absent any valid concerns received from the public hearing, staff recommends the Council forward a recommendation for approval to the State.
|
||||||||||
B. | Consideration and Action on Liquor License Application: Dara Wong Rodger, "Shift", 107 N. San Francisco St., Suite 2, Series 12 (restaurant), New License. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Hold the Public Hearing; absent any valid concerns received from the public hearing, staff recommends the Council forward a recommendation for approval to the State.
|
||||||||||
9. | CONSENT ITEMS
All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items. |
|||||||||
10. | ROUTINE ITEMS | |||||||||
A. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-17: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, amending the Flagstaff City Code, by deleting Chapter 6-03, Animals, in its entirety and adopting revised Chapter 6-03, Animal Keeping; providing for severability, authority for clerical corrections, and establishing an effective date. (Animal Keeping Code) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2015-17 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2015-17 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-17 |
||||||||||
B. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-05 - An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, amending Flagstaff City Code Title 9, TRANSPORTATION, Chapter 9-01, TRAFFIC CODE; creating the Office of Parking Manager; modifying the duties of the Traffic Engineer accordingly; modifying and adding traffic violations necessary for permit parking and pay-to-park programs; authorizing the Parking manager to implement the Comprehensive Parking Management Program for the downtown, southside and surrounding areas with the installation of parking meters, signage, and other improvements for permit parking and pay-to-park programs; and establishing a special revenue fund for revenues generated by implementation of the Comprehensive Parking Management Program. (Downtown Comprehensive Parking Management Program) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2016-05 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2016-05 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2016-05 |
||||||||||
C. | Marriott Project. | |||||||||
i. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-03: An ordinance of the Flagstaff City Council authorizing the acquisition of certain real property as a public right-of-way for the possible widening of Humphreys Street between Route 66 and Cherry Avenue. (Acquisition of right-of-way - Marriott development) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2016-03 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2016-03 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2016-03 |
||||||||||
ii. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-04: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, abandoning whatever right, title or interest it has in an approximately 82 square foot portion of public right-of-way generally located at the northwest corner of Aspen Avenue and Beaver Street to FMH Enterprises, LLC. (Abandonment of right-of-way - Marriott development) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2016-04 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2016-04 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2016-04 on February 2, 2016. |
||||||||||
iii. | Consideration of Development Agreement: With FMH Enterprises, LLC, for the Marriott Project located at the corner of Humphreys and Aspen Avenue. (Development Agreement - Marriott development) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Approve the Development Agreement with FMH Enterprises, LLC.
|
||||||||||
RECESS
6:00 P.M. MEETING RECONVENE |
||||||||||
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).
|
||||||||||
11. | ROLL CALL
|
|||||||||
12. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION | |||||||||
13. | CARRY OVER ITEMS FROM THE 4:00 P.M. AGENDA |
|||||||||
14. | PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS | |||||||||
A. | Public Hearing, Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2016-02 and Ordinance No. 2016-07: Public hearing to consider proposed amendments to Flagstaff Zoning Code the Preamble to the Zoning Code, Chapter 10-10 (Title, Purpose and Jurisdiction), Chapter 10-20 (Administration, Procedures and Enforcement), Chapter 10-30 (General to All), Chapter 10-40 (Specific to Zones), Chapter 10-50 (Supplemental to Zones) except for Division 10-50.100 (Sign Standards), Chapter 10-60 (Specific to Thoroughfares), Chapter 10-80 (Definitions) and Chapter 10-90 (Maps); consideration of Resolution No. 2016-02 declaring the proposed amendments as a public record; and adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-07, adopting amendments to Flagstaff Zoning Code Chapter 10-10 (Title, Purpose and Jurisdiction), Chapter 10-20 (Administration, Procedures and Enforcement), Chapter 10-30 (General to All), Chapter 10-40 (Specific to Zones), Chapter 10-50 (Supplemental to Zones) except for Division 10-50.100 (Sign Standards), Chapter 10-60 (Specific to Thoroughfares), Chapter 10-80 (Definitions) and Chapter 10-90 (Maps), by reference. (Zoning Code Amendments except Sign Code) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
At the Council Meeting of February 2, 2016 |
||||||||||
15. | REGULAR AGENDA | |||||||||
A. | Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No.2016-03: A Resolution of the City of Flagstaff Urging the United States Congress to Pass Carbon Fee and Dividend Legislation. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2016-03 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2016-03 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2016-03. |
||||||||||
B. | Discussion and Possible Action re: Current Issues Before the Arizona Legislature (THIS IS A STANDING ITEM - AS OF PUBLICATION OF THIS AGENDA NO ISSUES HAVE BEEN RAISED) | |||||||||
C. | Consideration of moving the March 15, 2016, Regular Council meeting to March 22, 2016, due to Spring Break. | |||||||||
16. | DISCUSSION ITEMS | |||||
17. | FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS After discussion and upon agreement by a majority of all members of the Council, an item will be moved to a regularly-scheduled Council meeting. |
|||||
A. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Vice Mayor Barotz and Councilmember Evans to place on a future agenda a discussion on winter snow play traffic congestion. | |||||
B. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Mayor Nabours to place on a future agenda a comprehensive discussion on affordable housing. | |||||
C. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Evans to place on a future agenda a Resolution of Support for Legislation Proposed by Representative Gosar and Senator McCain Regarding Downwinders. | |||||
18. | INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF, FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS | |||||
19. | ADJOURNMENT | |||||
|
4.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Minutes: City Council Special Work Session of October 19, 2015; City Council Work Session of October 27, 2015; and City Council Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Amend/approve the minutes of the City Council Special Work Session of October 19, 2015; City Council Work Session of October 27, 2015; and City Council Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Minutes of City Council meetings are a requirement of Arizona Revised Statutes and, additionally, provide a method of informing the public of discussions and actions being taken by the City Council. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
COUNCIL GOAL
|
|||||
Attachments: | 10.19.2015.CCSWS.Minutes | ||||
10.27.2015.CCWS.Minutes | |||||
12.01.2015.CCRM.Minutes | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
8.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Action on Liquor License Application: Roger Burton, “Giant #084", 1010 N. Country Club Dr, Series 10 (beer and wine store), New License.
|
|||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Hold the Public Hearing; absent any valid concerns received from the public hearing, staff recommends the Council forward a recommendation for approval to the State.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The liquor license process begins at the State level and applications are then forwarded to the respective municipality for posting of the property and holding a public hearing, after which the Council recommendation is forwarded back to the State. A Series 10 license allows a retail store to sell beer and wine (no other spirituous liquors), only in the original unbroken package, to be taken away from the premises of the retailer and consumed off the premises. Giant #084 is a new business that has not yet been constructed. The property has been posted as required, and the Police Department, Community Development, and Sales Tax divisions have reviewed the application with no concerns noted. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
There is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff as this is a recommendation to the State. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
Liquor licenses are a regulatory action and there is no Council goal that applies.
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Not applicable. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Table the item if additional information or time is needed. 2) Make no recommendation. 3) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for approval. 4) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for denial, stating the reasons for such recommendation. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Because the application is for a new license, consideration may be given to both the applicant's personal qualifications and the location. The deadline for issuing a recommendation on this application is February 8, 2016. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
This business will contribute to the tax base of the community. We are not aware of any other relevant considerations. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The application was properly posted on January 13, 2016. No written protests have been received to date. | |||||
Attachments: | Giant - Letter to Applicant | ||||
Hearing Procedures | |||||
Series 10 Description | |||||
Giant - PD Memo | |||||
Giant - Code Memo | |||||
Giant - Tax Memo | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
8.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Action on Liquor License Application: Dara Wong Rodger, "Shift", 107 N. San Francisco St., Suite 2, Series 12 (restaurant), New License. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Hold the Public Hearing; absent any valid concerns received from the public hearing, staff recommends the Council forward a recommendation for approval to the State.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The liquor license process begins at the State level and applications are then forwarded to the respective municipality for posting of the property and holding a public hearing, after which the Council recommendation is forwarded back to the State. A Series 12 license allows the holder of a restaurant license to sell and serve spirituous liquor solely for consumption on the premises of an establishment which derives at least forty percent (40%) of its gross revenue from the sale of food. The property has been posted as required, and the Police, Community Development, and Sales Tax divisions have reviewed the application with no concerns noted. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
There is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff as this is a recommendation to the State. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
Liquor licenses are a regulatory action and there is no Council goal that applies. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Not applicable. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Table the item if additional information or time is needed. 2) Make no recommendation. 3) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for approval. 4) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for denial, stating the reasons for such recommendation. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Because the application is for a new license, consideration may be given to both the location and the applicant's personal qualifications. The deadline for issuing a recommendation on this application is March 8, 2016. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
This business will contribute to the tax base of the community. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The application was properly posted on January 13, 2016. No written protests have been received to date. | |||||
Attachments: | Shift - Letter to Applicant | ||||
Hearing Procedures | |||||
Series 12 Description | |||||
Shift - PD Memo | |||||
Shift - Code Memo | |||||
Shift - Tax Memo | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2015-17: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, amending the Flagstaff City Code, by deleting Chapter 6-03, Animals, in its entirety and adopting revised Chapter 6-03, Animal Keeping; providing for severability, authority for clerical corrections, and establishing an effective date. (Animal Keeping Code) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2015-17 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2015-17 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-17 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
There are no financial implications to adopting ordinance 2015-17. |
|||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 10) Decrease the number of working poor. REGIONAL PLAN: Goal E&C.2. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Goal E&C.3. Strengthen community and natural environment resiliency efforts through climate adaptation efforts. Goal WR.6. Protect, preserve, and improve the quality of surface water, groundwater, and reclaimed water in the region. Goal LU.3. Continue to enhance the region's unique sense of place within the urban, suburban, and rural context. Policy LU.3.5. Allow and encourage urban agriculture. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Option A: Adopt Ordinance 2015-17 as submitted and authorize changes to the City of Flagstaff's livestock animal keeping regulations. Option B: Recommend changes to Ordinance 2015-17. Option C: Not adopt Ordinance 2015-17 and leave the existing code as is. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Throughout the Regional Plan and Zoning Code revision processes, City staff received feedback that residents feel the existing animal keeping regulations are unclear and too restrictive. The current code does not provide clear guidance about the number or type of animals allowed in the city. Additionally, it requires that individuals keeping livestock animals obtain approval from the Chief of Police. In response to these issues, staff drafted proposed edits to the animal keeping regulations. | |||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The purpose of these changes is to clarify the existing code and modify it to meet the community's needs. | |||||
Expanded Financial Considerations: | |||||
There are no financial implications to adopting ordinance 2015-17. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
Many City residents, raising animals for food, fiber, and labor is the most affordable way to obtain nutritious, locally grown food. Keeping livestock animals and bees can provide a host of benefits to the individual and community. For example, five laying hens, each of which will lay 250 to 280 eggs per year, can provide enough eggs to satisfy a family of five’s annual egg consumption. In addition, five chickens can eat the kitchen waste of a family of four, decreasing 1,900 pounds of waste sent to the landfill annually. Beekeeping has an even broader impact on our local environment. Over the past 50 years, domesticated bee populations have decreased by 50%, yet bees are invaluable in our food production due to the pollination activities they provide where one beehive can produce enough honey for 54 residents all year. The recession has highlighted the need for policies that reduce economic pressures, especially for lower income families, and urban agriculture is an effective tool to support this goal. The proposed changes to the City's livestock animal keeping regulations diminish obstacles to self-sufficiency while strengthening restrictions on noise, runoff, and smells associated with keeping livestock animals. Additionally, the proposed changes affirm that residential bees benefit our community in a variety of ways while providing a healthy source of food. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Involve: Throughout this process, the community was consulted in shaping the changes proposed in this ordinance. Staff sought direction from neighborhood associations, realtors, HOAs, and various community groups, such as Flagstaff Foodlink, Flagstaff Liberty Alliance, Southside Neighborhood Association, and the City of Flagstaff Sustainability Commission. Additionally, expert guidance was provided by individuals from the Arizona Farm Bureau, Arizona State Department of Agriculture, Northern Arizona Organic Beekeepers Association, and Arizona State Beekeepers Association, as well as local backyard farmers. Public input was sought through an open house at the downtown library on July 20, 2015, which was publicized through social media, radio interviews, community calendars, and the Arizona Daily Sun, and was attended by 26 members of the public. | |||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Option A: Adopt Ordinance 2015-17 as submitted and authorize changes to the City of Flagstaff's livestock animal keeping regulations. Option B: Recommend changes to Ordinance 2015-17. Option C: Not adopt Ordinance 2015-17 and leave the existing code as is. |
|||||
Attachments: | Ord. 2015-17 | ||||
PowerPoint | |||||
Ord. 2015-17.Redlined | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-05 - An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona, amending Flagstaff City Code Title 9, TRANSPORTATION, Chapter 9-01, TRAFFIC CODE; creating the Office of Parking Manager; modifying the duties of the Traffic Engineer accordingly; modifying and adding traffic violations necessary for permit parking and pay-to-park programs; authorizing the Parking manager to implement the Comprehensive Parking Management Program for the downtown, southside and surrounding areas with the installation of parking meters, signage, and other improvements for permit parking and pay-to-park programs; and establishing a special revenue fund for revenues generated by implementation of the Comprehensive Parking Management Program. (Downtown Comprehensive Parking Management Program) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2016-05 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2016-05 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2016-05 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Adoption of this ordinance would modify City Code as needed and desired to implement the Comprehensive Parking Management Program and would establish a special revenue fund for the Comprehensive Parking Management Program. Changes to the City Code include creating the office of Parking Manager and modifying the duties of the Traffic Engineer accordingly, modifying and adding traffic violations necessary for permit parking and pay-to-park programs, and authorizing the Parking Manager to install parking meters, signage, and other improvements for permit parking and pay-to-park programs. The special revenue fund would be for revenues and expenses within the downtown, southside, and surrounding impacted areas, and, expenditures would be further restricted to certain physical and operational parking related costs. If the City Council also adopts the Comprehensive Parking Management Program (Resolution 2016-1), then City staff, working with the stakeholders, would begin implementation of the program including the development of Administrative Guidelines and initiating an educational outreach program designed to inform the general users of the new programs and requirements. Subject to budget approval, City staff would procure and install the program components, most immediately including pay-to-park kiosks, permits, signage, minor improvements to parking facilities, and acquiring additional employee parking. Again subject to budget approval, additional enforcement staff would be hired and in the near future, a parking Manager would be hired. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Adoption of this ordinance is not expected to have financial implications in and of itself. However, if the City Council also adopts the Comprehensive Parking Management Program (Resolution 2016-1), and once all the program components are in place, the parking program is self-funding with an anticipated annual income of $1,000,000 and anticipated annual expenses of $600,000, leaving an annual balance of $400,000 to be held in reserve for the construction of new parking facilities (all figures being approximate projections). The start-up costs are approximately $350,000 which is proposed to be put forth by the City and re-paid from the parking income over the first two years of operations. None of these expenses are currently budgeted. However, if the Council adopts this ordinance and the Comprehensive Parking Management Program (Resolution 2016-1), the revenues and expenses will be expressed in the next City Budget (the process for which is just now getting started). | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 3) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
There have been several actions by the City Council related to parking and parking management over the last twenty-five years. These have included various code provisions for parking and parking meters, conditional adoption of a parking management plans, installation and removal of parking meters, and many more actions too numerous to list and not necessarily foundational to the decision currently before the City Council. Most recently, in December of 2015, the City Council considered the draft Comprehensive Parking Management Program and considered concepts for this ordinance at a work session and provided no direction for changes. |
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1. Adopt ordinance as proposed. 2. Adopt an amended version of the ordinance keeping in mind that amendments must be carefully drafted to maintain compatibility with the proposed Comprehensive Parking Management Program. 3. Do not adopt ordinance as proposed in which event the Comprehensive Parking Management Program cannot be implemented. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Historically, three general areas in Flagstaff have experienced notable parking issues. The north Downtown area has experienced issues with parking shortages and parking turn-over. The North End neighborhood has experienced issues with spill-over parking from north Downtown. And, in recent years, the Southside has also experienced issues resulting from spill-over parking and due to the successful ongoing Southside redevelopment, new parking issues are emerging. Discussions of addressing parking issues in north Downtown date back to the 1950s and five parking studies have been commissioned since the 1980s. In 2008 there was a partially successful effort to formulate a solution to the parking and other issues of downtown. However, that limited success was conditioned on resolving the remaining parts - notably including the development of more comprehensive solutions and achieving accord between, and buy-in from, all of the stakeholders. In addressing the unresolved parts, the follow-up work resulted in the formation of the Flagstaff Downtown Business Improvement and Revitalization District, however without addressing the parking issues. In 2011 there was an effort to solve some of the early renditions of parking issues in the Southside. Certainly since 2008 the parking problems are well understood and agreed upon. Looking from the highest elevation, we need to manage our existing parking and we need to construct new parking facilities. The impetus of the current consideration of our parking system is spill-over parking in the Southside, notably in the residential areas. Upon tackling this issue it quickly becomes clear that the issues and solutions are interconnected with the north Downtown and thus with the North End Neighborhood. And, we can reasonably anticipate that solutions for these areas will impact other adjacent neighborhoods such as La Plaza Vieja and Townsite. Thus the current Comprehensive Parking Management Program is a holistic solution to the known and anticipated parking problems. A distinguishing feature of the current effort relates back to the 2008 City Council direction - Not only are the parking issues addressed comprehensively, there is accord and buy-in from the stakeholders. While there may still be individuals that have concerns, the eleven stakeholder groups have all indicated support for the current approach. Each recognizes the need to address the parking issues now, the need to do so in a balanced way (compromise), and the need to start accumulating funds for constructing new parking facilities. Detailed background information relative to the current effort is included in the Comprehensive Parking Management Program (Resolution 2016-1) and is not duplicated here for brevity. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
If adopted, this ordinance would create the office of Parking Manager and modify the duties of the Traffic Engineer accordingly. Currently all parking is under the authority of the Traffic Engineer (within the Engineering Section). This ordinance would place authority for public parking in the general areas with pay-to-park requirements and permit parking under the Parking Manager (within the Economic Vitality Division). The authorities relative to public parking include the establishing, changing, suspending, or removing Administrative Guidelines (procedures, protocols, and requirements not established by the adopted Comprehensive Parking Management Program), parking rates, and physical parking facilities including associated signs, markings, equipment, and other improvements. Private parking and parking associated with municipal facilities are not included in the authority of the Parking Manager. Notably, it will be necessary for the Parking Manager and the Traffic Engineer to coordinate their efforts as the operations of these systems are inter-related. The adoption of this ordinance establishes separate accounting for the income and expenses of the Comprehensive Parking Management Program and establishes expenditure limits so that the funds are used solely for parking purposes. This is how the BBB Funds are managed and limited. |
|||||
Expanded Financial Considerations: | |||||
Details of the financial implications are included in the pro forma from the Comprehensive Parking Management Program (attached) and thus are not duplicated here for brevity. Notably the pro forma information in the document is illustrative and it is anticipated that final numbers will differ from the illustrations. It is anticipated that the annual revenues will exceed the expenses and that these revenues would remain in the fund balance of the parking fund until sufficient for parking construction. If the City Council also adopts the Comprehensive Parking Management Program (Resolution 2016-1), the expenses will be included in the next City Budget through the budget process that is currently just getting started. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
Addressing the parking issues enhances the economic vitality of the north Downtown and for the commercial portions of Southside. It will also enhance the property values in the surrounding residential districts. Currently, unmanaged parking is negatively impacting these properties and having an active plan and effort that leads to constructing parking will further alleviate the negative impacts. Managing our existing parking supply will allow us to use our resources more efficiently, ultimately reducing expenditures for constructing parking. Notably, an over-supply of parking is also harmful to the economic vitality of a community. The highest benefit is achieved through parking management. Traditionally, the cost of public parking has been borne by the general tax payers of the City. If adopted, this program would establish that users will pay for the use of public parking spaces in high parking demand areas. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Consult Involve Collaborate Empower The Comprehensive Parking Management Program has been significantly vetted with the community in general but specifically balancing the desires and needs of eleven identified key stakeholder groups. The stakeholders, users, and editor have variously worked on the development of this plan over the last eight years. The code changes proposed in this ordinance reflect specific desires and needs that staff heard during the vetting process. |
|||||
Attachments: | Ord. 2016-05 | ||||
Pro Forma | |||||
PowerPoint | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.C.i.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-03: An ordinance of the Flagstaff City Council authorizing the acquisition of certain real property as a public right-of-way for the possible widening of Humphreys Street between Route 66 and Cherry Avenue. (Acquisition of right-of-way - Marriott development) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2016-03 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2016-03 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2016-03 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Ordinance 2016-03 authorizes the City to purchase 2,209 square feet of land adjacent to Humphreys Street right-of-way for possible future expansion of the roadway for a net purchase price of $150,000. The purchase will include two 8 foot wide strips along the frontage of 100 Humphreys Street (existing Budget Rental) and 175 W. Aspen Avenue (former Wespac office building). Widening Humphreys Street to allow for a dual left turn lane from Route 66 onto Humphreys was identified as an important transportation improvement in the Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization Urban Mobility Study. The hotel project has a City staff approved site plan which includes the necessary setbacks for the future roadway project. The property has existing entitlement rights to allow construction of the project with only a staff approval. In addition, the properties are in building and civil plan review for the construction of a Marriott Residence Inn. The north parcel will be the site of the hotel, while the south parcel will be developed as surface parking. In addition to the proposed purchase, Ordinance 2016-04 to abandon 82 square feet of public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the project to accommodate moving the hotel to the east, out of the proposed purchase area, and a Development Agreement with additional terms are proposed. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The Development Agreement anticipates two property transactions. The first is the purchase of 2,209 square feet of real property from the developer for $155,600. The second transaction is the developer's purchase of 82 square feet of public right-of-way for $5,600. Thus, the net purchase price from the City is $150,000. Funds for this acquisition are not in the adopted FY 15/16 budget, but may be allocated from the general fund reserve. As with all new construction, the project will generate construction sales tax revenues. The estimated value of construction of the hotel is $8,500,000. Required fees for plan review and building permits will be collected per the adopted fee schedule. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 3) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics 6) Provide a well-managed transportation system. REGIONAL PLAN: Goal LU.1. Invest in existing neighborhoods and activity centers for the purpose of developing complete, and connected places. Goal LU.7. Provide for public services and infrastructure. Goal LU.9. Focus reinvestment, partnerships, regulations, and incentives on developing or redeveloping urban areas. Goal LU.11. Prioritize the continual reinvigoration of downtown Flagstaff, whose strategic location, walkable blocks, and historic buildings will continue to be a vibrant destination for all. Goal LU.12. Accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and private cars to supplement downtown’s status as the best-served and most accessible location in the region. Goal T.4. Promote transportation infrastructure and services that enhance the quality of life of the communities within the region. Goal T.1. Improve mobility and access throughout the region. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
This item was discussed at the January 12, 2016, Work Session and discussion and first reading of the Ordinance took place at the January 19, 2016, Council Meeting. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
If City Council decides not to acquire the right-of-way at this time, it can be considered for acquisition by the project sponsor at a future date. Staff believes the acquisition will cost more in the future and the DA limits additional payment to the hotel to costs associated with additional acquisition of right-of-way. However, waiting to purchase the right-of-way may provide more assurances as to the project sponsor and a funding source to design and construct the roadway. Should the proposed purchase and abandonment not be approved, the Developer has proposed an alternate site plan which would move the building to the west, closer to Humphreys Street and out of the Beaver/Aspen right-of-way. While the proposed project can be constructed without the acquisition of the right-of-way, it cannot proceed as designed without the approval of Ordinance 2016-04 to abandon 82 square feet of right-of-way. If the right-of-way is not abandoned, the building must be relocated to the west, into the area identified as needed for the Humphreys expansion. Should Council decide not to purchase the right-of-way, staff strongly supports proceeding with the abandonment to ensure future acquisition is still feasible. Staff believes it also makes sense to allow the ADA ramp to be constructed within the Aspen Avenue right-of-way so that it will not need to be relocated in the future. This can be accomplished with an administrative encroachment permit. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
In conjunction with the Ordinance to purchase, a Development Agreement (DA) has been prepared with additional terms of the purchase. The DA waives the requirement of a surface parking lot screen wall along Humphreys due to the anticipated road widening, allows surface parking to encroach into the future right-of-way until the time of the roadway project, vests the approved site plan for two years, establishes a net purchase price of $150,000 and provides financial assistance to relocate an ADA accessible ramp from the Humphreys Street future right-of-way to Aspen Avenue. Also, the DA limits additional compensation to the developer from revenue based compensation or for impacts created by the roadway widening to compensation for additional right-of-way only, and acknowledges potential developer participation in a future parking structure on the south parcel which may be achieved through a public/private partnership. In addition to the request to purchase property from the developer, a second Ordinance to abandon right-of-way at the corner of Aspen Avenue and Beaver Street is proposed. (Ordinance 2016-04) Humphreys Street is currently Arizona Department of Transportation jurisdiction. However, staff believes partnerships will be required to complete important improvements to the Regional Transportation system. At the recent Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization (FMPO) and Northern Arizona Intergovernmental Public Transportation Authority (NAIPTA) advance, there were many partners at the table with a discussion on how to complete necessary projects. Staff believes this is the type of transportation improvement that requires a partnership between the City, ADOT and the FMPO. In addition, staff believes it is good planning to purchase the property now, as a future acquisition will most certainly have an increased purchase price as the value of land in the downtown continues to increase. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Adoption of an Ordinance requires a public hearing that provides an opportunity to inform the public and receive public comment. | |||||
Attachments: | Draft Marriott DA V1 | ||||
Ord. 2016-03 | |||||
Valuation | |||||
PowerPoint | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.C.ii.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-04: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, abandoning whatever right, title or interest it has in an approximately 82 square foot portion of public right-of-way generally located at the northwest corner of Aspen Avenue and Beaver Street to FMH Enterprises, LLC. (Abandonment of right-of-way - Marriott development) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Ordinance No. 2016-04 by title only for the final time
2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2016-04 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Ordinance No. 2016-04 on February 2, 2016. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
During site plan review of the proposed Marriott Residence Inn, City staff recognized the need for proper placement of the hotel and other improvements to allow for a future roadway expansion along Humphreys Street. Staff determined acquisition of 8 feet for future right-of-way was desirable. This in turn moved the building to the east which results in an encroachment into public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the project, as shown on the attached site plan. Staff recommends 82 feet of right-of-way be abandoned as shown on Ordinance Exhibit B. Staff finds the abandonment of 82 square feet of right-of-way will not have an adverse impact on the City or its operations and protects the City's interests. The property must be purchased at fair market value, which has been determined by the City's Real Estate Manager at $5,600. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The applicant has prepared the required sketch and legal description of the right-of-way to be abandoned. No expenditure is required for the abandonment. Under the terms of the associated Development Agreement the abandoned right-of-way will be purchased for $5,600. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 3) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics 6) Relieve traffic congestion throughout Flagstaff REGIONAL PLAN: Goal LU.1. Invest in existing neighborhoods and activity centers for the purpose of developing complete, and connected places. Goal LU.7. Provide for public services and infrastructure. Goal LU.9. Focus reinvestment, partnerships, regulations, and incentives on developing or redeveloping urban areas. Goal LU.11. Prioritize the continual reinvigoration of downtown Flagstaff, whose strategic location, walkable blocks, and historic buildings will continue to be a vibrant destination for all. Goal LU.12. Accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and private cars to supplement downtown’s status as the best-served and most accessible location in the region. Goal T.4. Promote transportation infrastructure and services that enhance the quality of life of the communities within the region. Goal T.1. Improve mobility and access throughout the region. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
This item was discussed at the January 12, 2016, Work Session and discussion and first reading of the ordinance took place at the January 16, 2016, Council Meeting. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
If the City Council decides not to abandon the right-of-way the hotel will need to be relocated to the west which places it into the property identified as desired future right-of-way. The benefit of approving the abandonment is it allows for acquisition of the desired right-of-way along Humphreys Street at current market value and without permanent constructed improvements. If the abandonment is not approved and the hotel is moved to the west, future acquisition will be more costly and may not be feasible. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Adoption of an Ordinance requires a public hearing which provides an opportunity for the community to become informed and they may provide public comment on the proposed abandonment. |
|||||
Attachments: | Ord. 2016-04 | ||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.C.iii.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Development Agreement: With FMH Enterprises, LLC, for the Marriott Project located at the corner of Humphreys and Aspen Avenue. (Development Agreement - Marriott development) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Approve the Development Agreement with FMH Enterprises, LLC.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
This is the Development Agreement associated with the Marriott Project located at the corner of Humphreys and Aspen Avenue, as further discussed in Items 10-C and 10-D above. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
See further discussion in 10-C and 10-D above. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
See further discussion in 10-C and 10-D above. | |||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
See further discussion in 10-C and 10-D above. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
See further discussion in 10-C and 10-D above. | |||||
Attachments: | DA | ||||
DA Exhibits | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
14.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Public Hearing, Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2016-02 and Ordinance No. 2016-07: Public hearing to consider proposed amendments to Flagstaff Zoning Code the Preamble to the Zoning Code, Chapter 10-10 (Title, Purpose and Jurisdiction), Chapter 10-20 (Administration, Procedures and Enforcement), Chapter 10-30 (General to All), Chapter 10-40 (Specific to Zones), Chapter 10-50 (Supplemental to Zones) except for Division 10-50.100 (Sign Standards), Chapter 10-60 (Specific to Thoroughfares), Chapter 10-80 (Definitions) and Chapter 10-90 (Maps); consideration of Resolution No. 2016-02 declaring the proposed amendments as a public record; and adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-07, adopting amendments to Flagstaff Zoning Code Chapter 10-10 (Title, Purpose and Jurisdiction), Chapter 10-20 (Administration, Procedures and Enforcement), Chapter 10-30 (General to All), Chapter 10-40 (Specific to Zones), Chapter 10-50 (Supplemental to Zones) except for Division 10-50.100 (Sign Standards), Chapter 10-60 (Specific to Thoroughfares), Chapter 10-80 (Definitions) and Chapter 10-90 (Maps), by reference. (Zoning Code Amendments except Sign Code) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
At the Council Meeting of February 2, 2016 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Since the City Council adopted the Flagstaff Zoning Code on November 1, 2011 to replace the former Land Development Code (LDC), staff has compiled suggested amendments from City staff and interested Flagstaff residents and design professionals. The Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on June 24, 2015 unanimously recommended that the Council approve the proposed amendments. The Council held four work sessions in 2015 to discuss the need for, and provide direction on, possible amendments to the Flagstaff Zoning Code. These amendments are now presented to the Council for review and adoption, except for Division 10-50.100 (Sign Standards) which will be presented to the Council at a later date following review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Council's possible adoption of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code will not have a financial or budgetary impact on the Comprehensive Planning and Code Administration Program's budget. Later this year a proposal to amend the City's fee schedule will be presented to the Council for review and possible adoption. Proposed amendments to the fee schedule will update the fees for established permits and processes defined within the Zoning Code. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 7) Continue to implement the Flagstaff Regional Plan and focus efforts on specific plans 8) Improve effectiveness of notification, communication, and engagement with residents, neighborhoods and businesses and about City services, programs, policies, projects and developments REGIONAL PLAN: The Flagstaff Regional Plan supports the update and amendment of the Zoning Code with many applicable goals and policies. Only a few are listed here. Goal E&C.5. Preserve dark skies as an unspoiled natural resource, basis for an important economic sector, and core element of community character. Goal E&C.7. Give special consideration to environmentally sensitive lands in the development design and review process. Goal E.1. Increase energy efficiency. Goal CC.2. Preserve, restore, and rehabilitate heritage resources to better appreciate our culture. Goal CC.3. Preserve, restore, enhance, and reflect the design traditions of Flagstaff in all public and private development efforts. Goal CC.4. Design and develop all projects to be contextually sensitive, to enhance a positive image and identity for the region. Goal LU.3. Continue to enhance the region’s unique sense of place within the urban, suburban, and rural context. Goal LU.4. Balance housing and employment land uses with the preservation and protection of our unique natural and cultural setting. Goal LU.5. Encourage compact development principles to achieve efficiencies and open space preservation. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
The Council held a work session on June 30, 2015 to define a process for consideration and adoption of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code. Thereafter, the Council also held four work sessions to provide direction to staff on proposed amendments to the Zoning Code – September 15, October 19, November 10, and December 8, 2015. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Please refer to the Expanded Options and Alternatives below. | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
Since the Zoning Code’s adoption in November 2011 the following amendments have been adopted by the Council:
The Planning and Zoning Commission held three work sessions on the proposed amendments – April 29, 2015 (the required citizen review session), May 13, 2015 and May 27, 2015 – to review, discuss and provide comment and feedback to staff on the proposed amendments. On June 10, 2015 the Commission held a public hearing in which they heard from some residents and continued their review and discussion. Finally, on June 24, 2015 the Commission unanimously moved to recommend that the Council approve the proposed amendments as presented by staff together with additional changes recommended by the Commission. Generally, the amendments proposed to the Zoning Code fall into three distinct categories:
|
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Finalizing the amendments to the Zoning Code following it's adoption in November 2011 have been a staff priority for some years in order to make some important corrections to standards and to refine and improve various processes. The amendments included in the attached documents reflect deficiencies identified by staff, professional users of the Zoning Code (engineers, architects, etc.), as well as interested Flagstaff residents. The amendments proposed to the Zoning Code attached to Resolution 2016-02 are based on the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the direction provided by the Council at the policy review work sessions held in the last quarter of 2015 which resulted in additional amendments to the text being made. These may be easily identified because the text of the amendments and the narrative explaining the reason for the amendment based on the Council's policy review, are highlighted in yellow, and the word "COUNCIL" is included to highlight where the amendment has been made. Similarly, staff has highlighted some additional minor amendments, and these are also highlighted in yellow but with the word "STAFF" inserted. All of these additional amendments are also provided in a table on the first page of each amendment document. The amendments included in the "2015/2016 Amendments to City Code Title 10, Zoning Code, Except for Division 10-50.100 (Sign Standards)" attached to Resolution 2016-02 have been organized as listed below based on the number and complexity of the proposed changes to each chapter. This will make it easier to track any changes offered by motion and approved by the Council.
|
|||||
Expanded Financial Considerations: | |||||
None. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
With a document as complex as the Zoning Code, and despite staff’s best efforts and attention to detail, it was realized that some standards or issues would be incomplete or incorrect. Over the past few years, City planning staff, as well as staff that work with the Zoning Code on a regular basis (i.e. from the engineering, traffic, stormwater, housing or legal sections/divisions), have documented sections of the Code where possible amendments would be required. Also, ideas for amendments have been submitted by interested Flagstaff residents and design professionals, and these have been compiled with staff’s revisions into a comprehensive document of suggested revisions to the Code. Flagstaff residents, professional users of the Zoning Code, and City staff will benefit from the adoption of these proposed amendments as they will fix known deficiencies in the Code, improve processes, provide improved opportunities for participation by Flagstaff residents in meetings on new projects, clarify and simplify standards and procedures, and in some instances, will make the Code easier to read, understand and apply. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM, CONSULT, and INVOLVE Following the Council’s adoption of proposed amendments to the Sign Standards in October 2014, it was agreed that staff would commence work on a comprehensive package of amendments to the Zoning Code early in 2015. Over the course of the year, staff has engaged with members of such local organizations as Friends of Flagstaff’s Future, Northern Arizona Builders Association, Northern Arizona Association of Realtors, and the Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee to solicit their ideas for potential amendments to the Code. This was also accomplished by a number of articles published in the Flagstaff Business News and Cityscape, as well as frequent interviews on KAFF Radio. The Planning and Zoning Commission held three work sessions on the proposed amendments – April 29, 2015 (the required citizen review session), May 13, 2015 and May 27, 2015 – to review, discuss and provide comment and feedback to staff on the proposed amendments. Some residents attended these meetings and provided comments to the Commission. On June 10, 2015 the Commission held a public hearing in which they heard from some residents and continued their review and discussion. Finally, on June 24, 2015 the Commission unanimously moved to recommend that the Council approve the proposed amendments as presented by staff together with additional changes recommended by the Commission. The Council held a work session on June 30, 2015 to define a process for consideration and adoption of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Code. Thereafter, the Council also held four work sessions to provide direction to staff on proposed amendments to the Zoning Code – September 15, October 19, November 10, and December 8, 2015 – which were attended by residents, some of whom provided the Council with their ideas and comments on the amendments. In advance of all Council work sessions, staff has sent out an email to local stakeholder organizations such as Friends of Flagstaff’s Future, Northern Arizona Builders Association, Northern Arizona Association of Realtors, and the Flagstaff Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee. These groups were requested to forward the email to their members. Interviews with KAFF radio have also been scheduled regularly, and posts to the City’s Facebook accounts have been posted. Consistent with state law and the Zoning Code’s noticing requirements, a ¼ page display advertisement was printed in the Arizona Daily Sun in advance of all public hearings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Finally, copies of the proposed amendments, and information on meeting dates and times, has been posted to the Zoning Code webpage - www.flagstaff.az.gov/zoningcode. This link was also included in all email correspondence and outreach. |
|||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
|
|||||
Attachments: | Res. 2016-02 | ||||
2015/2016 Zoning Code Amendments | |||||
Ord. 2016-07 | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
15.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No.2016-03: A Resolution of the City of Flagstaff Urging the United States Congress to Pass Carbon Fee and Dividend Legislation. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2016-03 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2016-03 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2016-03. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Flagstaff chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby is requesting that the Flagstaff City Council pass Resolution 2016-03. This Resolution urges the United States Congress to pass legislation that will establish a revenue-neutral fee on carbon emissions. Proceeds from the proposed fee would then be returned to American households as a dividend. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Regional Economic Modeling, Inc. (REMI), an independent consulting firm, performed an economic analysis of the proposed legislation. The attached table shows their projected dividend per Flagstaff household, assuming a 2-adult, 2-child household. Population estimates from the most recent US Census were utilized to calculate the monthly and annual totals for Flagstaff as a whole. Their projections show a $34.22 average monthly dividend per Flagstaff household during the first year of the fee, and a $242.40 average monthly dividend by the twelfth year of the fee. Please review the attached Economic Analysis of Carbon Fee Resolution to view the full projected dividend amounts per Flagstaff household for each year of the initiative. |
|||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 10) Decrease the number of working poor REGIONAL PLAN: Policy E&C.2.1. Encourage the reduction of all energy consumption, especially fossil-fuel generated energy, in public, commercial, industrial, and residential sectors. Policy E&C.2.2. Promote investments that strengthen climate resiliency. Policy E.1.10. Incentivize energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies in construction projects. Policy E.2.1. Promote renewable energy sources that reduce demand upon fossil fuels and other forms of generation that produce waste. Policy E.2.5. Pursue, promote, and support utility-scale renewable energy production such as biomass facilities, solar electricity, wind power, waste-to-energy, and other alternative energy technologies. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Elect not to adopt. | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
PROPOSED FEDERAL LEGISLATION: Citizens’ Climate Lobby requests that the United States Congress enact legislation which will levy an annually increasing fee on carbon dioxide emissions produced by fossil fuels at the point of production and importation (mine, well, or port), and return all of the revenue from this fee to Americans on an equitable basis. The legislation would also incorporate suitable carbon-content-based fees/rebates for imports and exports to nations that have not taken a similar action. RATIONALE BEHIND LEGISLATIVE ACTION: The City of Flagstaff’s mission is to protect and enhance the quality of life for its citizens. The voter approved Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 asserts that environmental health is inherent to individual and community health and prudent, fact-based stewardship of the economy and the environment is a critical responsibility in order to ensure that the resources of the City and its natural environment are available for future generations. There have been marked increases in extreme weather events impacting northern Arizona including drought, wildfires, wind, and flooding, which are expected to further worsen. If left unaddressed, the consequences of a changing climate, including severe weather events, have the potential to adversely impact all Flagstaff residents, threatening productivity in key economic sectors such as construction, ranching, and tourism, saddling future generations with costly economic and environmental burdens, and imposing additional costs on City and County budgets that will further add to fiscal challenges. The urgently needed transition from fossil fuels can be accomplished effectively with a market-based program, namely a revenue-neutral carbon fee and dividend. The Citizens’ Climate Lobby believes it is the responsibility and duty of the City Council to advocate for state and national policies that will protect all Flagstaff residents from events that could negatively impact their health, welfare, and safety. Other cities in our region that have passed resolutions calling on Congress to enact carbon fee-and-dividend include Salt Lake City, Santa Fe, Las Cruces, and Carbondale. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The Flagstaff Chapter of Citizen's Climate Lobby has been speaking with a number of community groups about this proposed resolution. | |||||
Attachments: | Economic Analysis of Carbon Fee Resolution | ||||
Res. 2016-03 | |||||
PowerPoint | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
17.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Vice Mayor Barotz and Councilmember Evans to place on a future agenda a discussion on winter snow play traffic congestion. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Vice Mayor Barotz and Councilmember Evans have requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there is a majority of Council interested in placing it on a future agenda. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
None | |||||
Attachments: | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
17.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Mayor Nabours to place on a future agenda a comprehensive discussion on affordable housing. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Mayor Nabours has requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there is a majority of Council interested in placing it on a future agenda. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
None | |||||
Attachments: | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
17.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Evans to place on a future agenda a Resolution of Support for Legislation Proposed by Representative Gosar and Senator McCain Regarding Downwinders. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Councilmember Evans has requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there is a majority of Council interested in placing it on a future agenda. This item was placed on the Final Agenda for February 2, 2016, due to time limitations. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
None | |||||
Attachments: | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||