DRAFT AGENDA
4:00 P.M. MEETING
Individual Items on the 4:00 p.m. meeting agenda may be postponed to the 6:00 p.m. meeting.
|
1. | CALL TO ORDER
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).
|
|||||||||
2. | ROLL CALL
|
|||||||||
3. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MISSION STATEMENT
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Flagstaff is to protect and enhance the quality of life of its citizens. |
|||||||||
4. | APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS | |||||||||
5. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak. |
|||||||||
6. | PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS |
|||||||||
7. | APPOINTMENTS Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for the purpose of discussing or considering employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee, or employee of any public body...., pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1). |
|||||||||
A. | Consideration of Appointments: Parks and Recreation Commission. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring August 2018.
|
||||||||||
B. | Consideration of Appointments: Sustainability Commission. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring October 2016.
Make two appointments to a term expiring October 2018. |
||||||||||
C. | Consideration of Appointments: Heritage Preservation Commission. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Make one At Large appointment to a term expiring December 2017.
|
||||||||||
D. | Consideration of Appointments: Airport Commission. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Make two appointments to terms expiring October 2018.
|
||||||||||
E. | Consideration of Appointments: Beautification and Public Art Commission. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring June 2018.
|
||||||||||
F. | Consideration of Appointments: Commission on Diversity Awareness. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Make three appointments to a term expiring September 2018.
Make two appointments to a term expiring September 2017. Make two appointments to a term expiring September 2016. |
||||||||||
8. | LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARINGS None |
|||||||||
9. | CONSENT ITEMS All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items. |
|||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Contracts: Laboratory Services for water, wastewater and pre-treatment sampling. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
B. | Consideration and Approval of a Final Plat request by Mogollon Engineering & Surveying, Inc., on behalf of Pinnacle 146 LLC, for the subdivision of approximately 11.22 acres into 49 single-family residential townhouse lots located at 800 E Sterling Lane within the Medium Density Residential (MR) zone. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Staff recommends the City Council approve the final plat, with the conditions outlined in the staff summary and its attachments, and authorize the Mayor to sign both the final plat and City/Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that all conditions have been met and documents are ready for recordation. |
||||||||||
10. | ROUTINE ITEMS | |||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: Animal Shelter Services | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
B. | Discussion and Direction: Specialty Appointments to City Commissions | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Council direction to staff to bring back ordinance to address specialty criteria and process for bringing applications forward
|
||||||||||
RECESS
6:00 P.M. MEETING RECONVENE |
||||||||||
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).
|
||||||||||
11. | ROLL CALL
|
|||||||||
12. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION | |||||||||
13. | CARRY OVER ITEMS FROM THE 4:00 P.M. AGENDA |
|||||||||
14. | PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS | |||||||||
A. | Public Hearing: Providing staff and consultants rate study presentation prior to modifying water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater rates and fees. (Staff/consultant presentation regarding rate adjustment) | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
Continue the public hearing
|
||||||||||
B. | Public Hearing and Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2015-35: A resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona adopting the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan as a Minor Plan Amendment to the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 and establishing an effective date. | |||||||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||||||
1) Hold Public Hearing
2) Read Resolution No.2015-35 by title only 3) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2015-35 by title only (if approved above) 4) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-35 |
||||||||||
15. | REGULAR AGENDA None |
|||||||||
16. | DISCUSSION ITEMS None |
|||||||||
17. | FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS After discussion and upon agreement of three members of the Council, an item will be moved to a regularly-scheduled Council meeting. |
|||||||||
A. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Evans to place on a future agenda discussion of Downtown Disability Parking. | |||||||||
B. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Putzova to place on a future agenda discussion and possible action regarding Indigenous People. | |||||||||
18. | INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF, REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS | |||||||||
19. | ADJOURNMENT |
|||||||||
|
7.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Parks and Recreation Commission. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring August 2018.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Parks and Recreation Commission consists of seven (7) citizen members. The Parks and Recreation Commission makes recommendations to the Council regarding City parks and recreational programs, the annual budget and capital improvements for the Parks and Recreation Divisions. There was a recent resignation on the commission so there is currently one seat available. It is important to fill vacancies on Boards and Commissions quickly so as to allow the Commission to continue meeting on a regular basis. There are two applications on file for consideration by the Council, they are as follows: Margaret "Marney" Babbitt (new applicant) Jennifer Grogan (new applicant) COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT: Councilmember Overton. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None.
|
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint one Commissioner: By appointing a member at this time, the commission will be at full membership and able to continue to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the openings by Board members and City staff has occurred, informing others of these vacancies through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | P & R Roster | ||||
P & R Authority | |||||
P & R Applicant Roster | |||||
P & R Applications | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
7.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Sustainability Commission. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring October 2016.
Make two appointments to a term expiring October 2018. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Sustainability Commission consists of seven citizens, and is responsible for recommending and coordinating activities in concert with the City of Flagstaff Sustainability Program. To accomplish this objective, the Commission will address the social, economic, and environmental considerations of meeting the needs of current and future citizens. Among the Commission’s directives are the promotion of sustainable practices in all spheres of life and educating Flagstaff citizens. There are currently three seats available; two commissioners have reached the end of their terms (one is eligible for reappointment) and one of the recently appointed commissioners had to resign due to unexpectedly moving out of the city limits. It is important to fill vacancies on Boards and Commissions quickly so as to allow the Commission to continue meeting on a regular basis. There are three applications on file for consideration by the Council, they are as follows: Amelia Blake (new applicant) Elisha Dorfsmith (current commissioner) Dara Marks-Marino (new applicant) COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT (Each Councilmember will make one appointment): Councilmember Putzova, Councilmember Overton, and Councilmember Evans |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan.
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint three Commissioners: By appointing members at this time, the commission will be at full membership and able to continue to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the openings by Board members and City staff has occurred, informing others of these vacancies through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | Sustainability Roster | ||||
Sustainability Authority | |||||
Sustainability Applicant Roster | |||||
Sustainability Applications | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
7.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Heritage Preservation Commission. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make one At Large appointment to a term expiring December 2017.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Heritage Preservation Commission advises the City Council on all matters relating to historic preservation, and reviews development projects in designated historic districts. It consists of seven citizen members; two citizens are professionals in the areas of architecture, history, architectural history, planning or archeology; two citizens shall be owners of locally designated historic properties or properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and three citizens shall be at-large from the general community. There is currently one at large seat available. It is important to fill vacancies on Boards and Commissions quickly so as to allow the Commission to continue meeting on a regular basis. There are four applications on file for consideration by the Council, they are as follows:
Kurt Brydenthal (new applicant)
Jerry McLaughlin (new applicant) James Speed (new applicant) Charlie Webber (new applicant)
COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNEMENT: Vice Mayor Barotz
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None
|
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint one Commissioner: By appointing a member at this time, the Heritage Preservation Commission will be at full membership, allowing the group to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the opening by Commission members and City staff has occurred, informing others of this vacancy through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | HPC Roster | ||||
HPC Authority | |||||
HPC Applicant Roster | |||||
HPC Applications | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
7.D.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Airport Commission. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make two appointments to terms expiring October 2018.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Airport Commission consists of seven citizens, and is responsible for reviewing and reporting to the Council on the development of the Airpark and on matters affecting the operation and efficiency of the airport, using the Airport Master Plan as a guide. There are currently two seats available. It is important to fill vacancies on Boards and Commissions quickly so as to allow the Commission to continue meeting on a regular basis.
There are seven applications on file and they are as follows: Beth Applebee (current commissioner)
Brian Cox (new applicant)
Mark Didovic (new applicant)
Terry Greene (new applicant)
Ben Murphy (new applicant)
Chris Shields (new applicant)
Jeff Wheless (current commissioner)
COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT (Each Councilmember will make one appointment): Councilmember Overton and Councilmember Putzova |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint two Commissioners: by appointing two members at this time, the Airport Commission be at full membership, allowing the group to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: Board members and City staff have informed the community of these vacancies though word of mouth in addition to the vacancies being posted on the City's website. | |||||
Attachments: | Airport Roster | ||||
Airport Authority | |||||
Airport Applicant Roster | |||||
Airport Applications | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
7.E.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Beautification and Public Art Commission. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring June 2018.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Beautification and Public Art Commission consists of seven citizens, and recommends expenditures from the BBB beautification fund and public art portion of the BBB arts and science fund. It studies and recommends community beautification projects ranging from landscaping and irrigation, signs and billboards, buildings, facilities, streetscapes, gateways, the purchase and installation of public art projects within beautification projects, property acquisition for beautification and/or public art projects, and neighborhood-initiated projects, to mention a few. There are currently three seats available; however, staff is only asking to fill one at this point. Two of the three vacancies involve specialty appointments and the Council will be meeting in the near future to further define those seats and provide direction to staff on how the appointments should be made. Soon after that staff will return to Council with the appointments to the specialty seats. The At-Large seat is what is being requested to fill; the term of Vicki Foster has expired and she is ready to move off the commission as she has served two full terms. She has agreed to remain seated until her replacement can be appointed. It is important to fill vacancies on Boards and Commissions quickly so as to allow the Commission to continue meeting on a regular basis. There are three applications currently on file, they are as follows:
Andres Adauto (new applicant)
Dan Clark (new applicant) Erin Joyce (new applicant)
Council Appointment Assignment: Councilmember Evans
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff.
|
|||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint one Commissioner: By appointing a Commissioner at this time, the Beautification and Public Art Commission will be at near full membership, allowing the group to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the opening by Board members and City staff has occurred, informing others of these vacancies through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | BPAC Roster | ||||
BPAC Authority | |||||
BPAC Applicant Roster | |||||
BPAC Applications | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
7.F.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Commission on Diversity Awareness. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make three appointments to a term expiring September 2018.
Make two appointments to a term expiring September 2017. Make two appointments to a term expiring September 2016. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Commission on Diversity Awareness consists of seven regular citizens who represent the diverse population of Flagstaff. The mission of the commission includes, but is not limited to, fostering mutual understanding, tolerance, respect, and awareness among all citizens; recognizing the different economic, cultural, social, racial, religious, and ethnic groups within the City; cooperating in the development of educational programs dedicated to improving community relations; and enlisting the support of various groups to foster diversity awareness. There are currently seven seats available. Because the commission has been inactive for some time it is necessary to make staggered appointments as commission authority specifies. There are eight applications on file for consideration by the Council, they are as follows: Marian Bitsui (new applicant) Robert Duke (new applicant) Khalif Durham (new applicant) Anne Hart (new applicant) Robert Knox (new applicant) Caroline McDonald (new applicant) Stefan Rosic (new applicant) Deborah Shepard (new applicant) With seven appointments occurring simultaneously, Council may wish to consider discussing the appointments in Executive Session to avoid discussion outside of a public meeting and duplication of appointments. COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT (Each Councilmember will make one appointment): Councilmember Putzova, Councilmember Oravits, Mayor Nabours, Councilmember Overton, Councilmember Brewster, Councilmember Evans, Vice Mayor Barotz. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint seven Commissioners: By appointing members at this time, the commission will be at full membership and able to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Attached is a brief history of the Commission on Diversity Awareness. | |||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the openings by Board members and City staff has occurred, informing others of these vacancies through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | CODA Update | ||||
CODA Roster | |||||
CODA Authority | |||||
CODA Applicant Roster | |||||
CODA Applications | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
9.A.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contracts: Laboratory Services for water, wastewater and pre-treatment sampling. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Utilities Division contracts out laboratory services for water, wastewater and pretreatment sampling. Sampling costs make up the largest budgets items outside of salaries for the Regulatory Compliance Section. It is very important that the Utilities Division secure contracts with several laboratories to guarantee pricing and sample analysis time. Sampling analysis accuracy is the core of meeting compliance with our permitting needs. Additionally, Utilities also performs sampling that is not required for compliance to assure all processes are working correctly. Therefore, the Utilities Division also needs to have several labs available that can perform similar analysis to allow the flexibility of sending split or equivalent samples to more than one lab to spot check accuracy. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The Regulatory Section already has the laboratory sampling in its budget. The total of all four contracts are not to exceed $150,000 each year. The new contracts will not have any additional financial impact. The contracts are important to secure pricing and service guarantees. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
2) Ensure Flagstaff has a long-term water supply for current and future needs.
3) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
A previous laboratory contract was approved by council in 2010 to secure pricing and service. The previous contract was approved prior to the Regulatory Compliance Section, but included at least four laboratories to assure that each program in Utilities was able to secure sampling options to meet permit conditions. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Approve the recommended contracts. Approving the four laboratory contracts secures pricing guarantees and sampling guarantees which the City needs for compliance and non-compliance sampling. 2) Not approve the recommended contracts. Not approving the contracts will force the Regulatory Compliance Section to pay whatever the current pricing may be at the time of sampling. Additionally, not approving the contracts may cause delays in sampling analysis, which could lead to a failure to meet permit deadlines. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
The Utilities Division contracts for laboratory services for water, wastewater and pre-treatment sampling. Since sampling costs make up the largest budget items outside of salaries for the Regulatory Compliance Section. It is very important that the Utilities Division secure contracts with several laboratories to guarantee pricing and sample analysis time. Sampling analysis accuracy is the core of meeting compliance with all our permitting needs. The Utilities Division needs to have several laboratories available to allow the flexibility to send split samples to other labs to assure accuracy. Prior to the City's existing laboratory contract expiring, a new Request for Proposals (RFP) was conducted. The Purchasing Section received proposals from four laboratories. Each lab proposal was evaluated and scored by four Utilities Division Staff evaluators. The proposals were scored based on three criterion, each with a weighted percentage: Evaluation Criterion #1-- (40%) Experience & Qualifications. Evaluation Criterion #2-- (30%) Capacity of Offeror/Experience. Evaluation Criterion #3-- (30%) Pricing. Each laboratory that submitted a proposal offered different services and sampling methods. Likewise, each program in Regulatory Compliance (water, wastewater and pretreatment) require different services and analysis methods. Together the four proposals received by the Purchasing Section will meet the needs of all the programs in the Utilities Division for compliance and non-compliance sampling. Note: The attached Contract is the final template the City will use with each of the four independent laboratories. However, one of the attachments to this staff summary includes the respective fees of each of the four independent laboratories in exchange for the laboratory testing they will be providing. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The City evaluated proposals from four (4) labs. There were no proposals submitted by any Flagstaff laboratories. The proposals were evaluated and scored according to experience, price and capacity for services. |
|||||
Expanded Financial Considerations: | |||||
The total of all lab services contract is not to exceed $150,000. The budget within the FY 2016 Regulatory Compliance Section budget totals $148,258 in the following accounts 202-08-306-1081-2-4207, 202-08-306-1082-0-4207,202-08-306-1083-0-4207 and 202-08-306-1087-0-4207. Any costs over this amount will be covered by budget appropriation in 202-08-306-1081-0-4290 and 202-08-306-1082-0-4290 totaling $15,000. | |||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The community will benefit when the Utilities Division has guaranteed pricing and sample analysis time. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
None |
|||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
The alternative of not approving all the laboratory contracts hinders the flexibility of the Utilities Division of guaranteed sample pricing and analysis times. This can have a direct impact on meeting compliance with rules and permits for the Utilities Division. |
|||||
Attachments: | Scoring Tabulation | ||||
Contract for laboratories | |||||
Vendor Fee Structure | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
9.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of a Final Plat request by Mogollon Engineering & Surveying, Inc., on behalf of Pinnacle 146 LLC, for the subdivision of approximately 11.22 acres into 49 single-family residential townhouse lots located at 800 E Sterling Lane within the Medium Density Residential (MR) zone. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Staff recommends the City Council approve the final plat, with the conditions outlined in the staff summary and its attachments, and authorize the Mayor to sign both the final plat and City/Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that all conditions have been met and documents are ready for recordation. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Approval of a 49-lot townhouse subdivision that will increase the number of developable townhouse lots within the City. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
No financial liabilities are anticipated by the approval of this final plat. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 1) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics REGIONAL PLAN: Goal NH.3 - Make available a variety of housing types at different price points, to provide housing opportunity for all economic sectors. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
The City Council approved the Pinnacle Pines Unit 2 Preliminary Plat on October 21, 2014. |
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1. Approve the final plat, as recommended by staff, with one condition as identified below.
3. Deny the final plat based on non-compliance with the approved preliminary plat, the Zoning Code, the Subdivision Code, and/or the Engineering Standards. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Pinnacle 146, LLC is the property owner of record of approximately 18.59 acres located at 800 E Sterling Lane within the Pinnacle Pines townhouse subdivision. The proposed preliminary plat subdivides the Subject Property into 106 single-family residential townhouse lots. This is the second phase of the Pinnacle Pines townhouse subdivision. The first phase, Unit 1, is nearing build-out with 102 single-family residential townhouse lots on approximately 22 acres. On March 7, 2005, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2005-15 approving a Development Agreement between the City and developer, Resolution No. 2005-16 that amended the Flagstaff Area Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan land use designation for the site from High Density Residential to Medium Density Residential in order to support a reduced density, Ordinance No. 2005-05 that modified the conditions of Ordinance No. 1976 for the development of a single-family residential townhouse project consisting of 206 units called Pinnacle Pines, and a tentative plat for Unit 1 of the subdivision. On October 21, 2014, the City Council approved the Pinnacle Pines Unit 2 Preliminary Plat for the subdivision of approximately 18.59 acres into 106 single-family residential townhouse lots. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Inform The subject property's existing zoning allows for the proposed subdivision. No public hearing or public outreach is required as part of the City Council's review of the final plat. |
|||||
Attachments: | Final Plat Application | ||||
City/Subdivider Agreement | |||||
Unit 2 Phase 2 Final Plat | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.A.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Animal Shelter Services | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Coconino Humane Association provides services to the City of Flagstaff for the acceptance of stray animals that are picked up by Animal Control Officers or brought to the shelter by private citizens. Under this contract, the Coconino Humane Association shall provide and perform animal control professional services in conformity with the National Animal Control Association (NACA) policies. The services related programs under this contract include adoption, shelter, spaying, and neutering, licensing, vaccinations, euthanasia and community outreach. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The annual fee for these services will be $199,985. The FY2016 adopted budget totaling $199,985 for these services is in account 001-09-402-1311-1-4273. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
Council Goals:
3) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics 5) Develop and implement guiding principles that address public safety service levels through appropriate staffing levels 8) Improve effectiveness of notification, communication, and engagement with residents, neighborhoods and businesses and about City services, programs, policies, projects and developments |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Yes. April, 2015, Council Budget Study Sessions | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1.) Approve the contract with the Coconino Humane Association. This contract will provide animal control professional services for the City of Flagstaff. 2.) Not approve this contract. Without this contract in place, there would not be professional animal control services that are critical to the City of Flagstaff. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
The City has contracted with the Coconino Humane Association to provide animal shelter services for approximately 15 years. The Coconino Humane Association is and always has been the only organization in Flagstaff that can provide the much needed program services, such as: adoption, shelter, spaying and neutering, licensing, vaccinations, euthanasia and community outreach and provide and perform these animal control services in conformity with the National Animal Control Association (NACA) policies. Over the years, when a formal competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) has been conducted, the Coconino Humane Association is the only organization that has responded to the City's RFP. The City's Purchasing Section conducted the most recent Request for Proposals (RFP) on January 22, 2015, with proposal responses due no later than February 10, 2015. The City, again, received only one (1) proposal response from the Coconino Humane Association located in Flagstaff, Arizona. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Local Flagstaff organization Animal shelter services is a critical need for the City of Flagstaff and currently, the Coconino Humane Association is the only Flagstaff organization who can provide the professional service programs we are in critical need of. | |||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff benefits by having an available facility that will accept, provide shelter for and adopt stray dogs and cats. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Inform Consult Involve Collaborate |
|||||
Attachments: | Service Agreement | ||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
10.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Discussion and Direction: Specialty Appointments to City Commissions | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction to staff to bring back ordinance to address specialty criteria and process for bringing applications forward
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
During a recent Work Session the City Council discussed various aspects related to the City's Boards and Commissions. While two of the directives (changes to Council Appointment Team selection process and reactivating the Diversity Awareness Commission), one item remains and that is for further discussion by the Council as to criteria for those Commissions which call for Specialty Representatives. Commissions impacted by this requirement include: Beautification and Public Art Commission; Heritage Preservation Commission; Open Spaces Commission and Tourism Commission. Once Council has had an opportunity to review and/or establish criteria desired for each of these commissions, staff will prepare and bring back an ordinance to make the required adjustments. Additionally, this is an opportunity for Council to provide direction to staff on the process to bring applications forward for consideration. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
None | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 8) Improve effectiveness of notification, communication, and engagement with residents, neighborhoods and businesses and about City services, programs, policies, projects and developments |
|||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
The City Council has previously discussed the Boards/Commissions program and other aspects, but has not specifically had an opportunity to discuss what criteria they would like to establish for each of these commissions. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Establish criteria for specialty appointments for any/all of the above-referenced commissions and delineate the appointment process; 2) Direct staff to bring back an ordinance to amend the City Code to eliminate such criteria. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
During a recent Work Session the City Council discussed various aspects related to the City's Boards and Commissions, including the criteria for those commissions which call for some members to have certain experience or qualifications ("Specialty Representatives"). The attached chart shows those commissions which currently have Specialty Representatives and the current language of the respective sections of the City Code. Prior discussion revolved around the fact that while special representatives were required for four of the City's commissions, criteria were not included. This has been placed on the agenda as an opportunity for the Council to further discuss this issue and consider what criteria they would like to establish and provide direction to staff. Also, this is an opportunity for Council to direct staff in what process they would like staff to follow in the appointment process overall. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Inform |
|||||
Attachments: | Table | ||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
14.A.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Public Hearing: Providing staff and consultants rate study presentation prior to modifying water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater rates and fees. (Staff/consultant presentation regarding rate adjustment) | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Continue the public hearing
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
This is the first in a series of Public Hearings at Council meetings for utility rate adjustment discussions on amending existing rates and fees for water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater. In these meetings staff will introduce the proposed rate adjustments and the recommended options. The Council will be able to identify any policy issues or options that warrant a more in-depth discussion, either at the current meeting, or in a future meeting. No public comment will be taken on October 6, 2013. This action complies with Arizona Revised Statute 9-511.01 Water and Wastewater business; rates; procedures. The City Council adopted a notice of intention to increase water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater fees at at its regular meeting of August 25, 2015. This public hearing was advertised in the Arizona Daily Sun on August 1, 2015 and August 8, 2015. All State requirements for modifying the water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater rates and fees have been met. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
Council Goals: 2) Ensure Flagstaff has a long-term water supply for current and future needs. 3) Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics. 7) Address key issues and processes related to the implementation of the Regional Plan. The Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 supports the update and adjustment to City utility rates with the following goals; Policies are only included where needed to clarify a goal. Goal WR.2 Manage a coordinated system of water, wastewater and reclaimed water utility service facilities and resources at the City level and identify funding to pay for new resources. Goal WR.4 logically enhance and extend the City's public water, wastewater and reclaimed water utility services including their treatment, distribution and collection systems in both urbanized and newly developed areas of the City to provide an efficient delivery of services. Goal E.1 increase energy efficiency. E1.4 promote cost effective energy efficient terminologies and design. Goal U.7 Provide for public services and infrastructure. Goal LU.8 balance future growth with available water resources. Goal CD.1 Improve the City and County financial systems to provide for needed infrastructure development and rehabilitation, including maintenance and enhancement of existing infrastructure. Goal PF.2 Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities services, and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics. |
|||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
The City Council adopted a Resolution of Intent to modify water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater at the August 25, 2015 meeting. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Council has the option to choose not to implement any rate modifications. | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
The City desires rates and fees that fully fund operations, maintenance, present and future capital costs for plant improvements as well as distribution and collection systems capacity, infrastructure rehabilitation, replacements and expansion. The City is facing several challenges to continuing its high-quality operations. Utility revenues are not keeping pace with increasing operational and capital costs. Growth and approved development has necessitated the need to procure additional water supply through the drilling of new wells. Utility infrastructure is aging and requires replacement and rehabilitation. The rate and fee study considers many factors that impact the cost of providing water,wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater services. Among these factors are; requirement to maintain sufficient revenue to cover the City's debt service costs, the cost of operations, including employee and energy costs, the cost of future projects to maintain service reliability, the cost of panned infrastructure maintenance and expansion. The rate and fee financial study guides the rate evaluation and provide recommendations on changes to the current utility rate and fee structures to meet these challenges. Willdan Financial Services was retained by the City to conduct a Utilities Rate Study for the City's water, wastewater, reclaimed waler and stormwater utilities. Willdan gathered the background budget information, financial records, billing data and other relevant information prior to their analysis. A fair and equitable cost based system of rates and charges were then developed which are projected to provide sufficient revenue for each utility evaluated. The results of their analysis ad final report will be presented. The City Water Commission has met on six occasions over the past nine months reviewing the proposed rates. The water commission made recommendations for council to adopt rate options as identified in the July 16, 2015 Water Commission meeting. The final rate study analysis have been available online and on file with the City Clerk effective August 1, 2015. They will have been available for review and comment for more than 30 days prior to the October 6th public hearing and ordinance consideration |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Several objectives were identified during the rate study to guide decisions regarding the proposed financial plans and rate structures.The major objectives of the study were;
Utilities is one division, with four separate financial funds. Services provided by the City are funded by money collected from rate payers for those services. The City of Flagstaff Utilities Department receives no funding from property taxes. Money collected from the wastewater rate payers may be used only to fund wastewater services and money collected from water ratepayers may be used only to fund water services. Transfer of money between these funds is prohibited except as payment for services provided. Comparison of Flagstaff rates with other Arizona cities will be provided in the staff presentation. |
|||||
Expanded Financial Considerations: | |||||
The City is recognizing the need to establish an on-going capital improvement program to replace and rehabilitate water and sewer pipelines that have reached the end of their useful life. The proposed rates will establish a capital improvement program that is financially capable of replacing 2 miles of waterline and 1 mile of sewer line during each fiscal year. The increased water and sewer capacity fees reflect the value of extra capacity in the systems an the anticipated cost of new facilities that will be attributed to growth for the next ten years.The increased capacity fees will add to the cost of development. Water, Wastewater, Reclaimed Water and Stormwater user fees will be phased in over a 5 year period. The new rates would take effect on January 1 of each year beginning in the year 2016. The new capacity fees would go into effect in January 1, 2016. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
Regular rate reviews and modifications are necessary to maintain stable financial position for the water, wastewater, reclaimed water and stormwater funds. The goal of the proposed rate increase is to provide for a financially sound and sustainable utility system. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Inform Consult Involve Collaborate The Water Commission held meetings to discuss the rates, capacity and service fees on 1/15/2015, 2/19/15, 4/16/15, 5/21/15, 6/18/15 and 7/16/15. The Water Commission held an informational Public Hearing meeting on 6/15/15. This meeting was videotaped and is available for review on the City website. The Water Commission has considered numerous options during the spring prior to making their final recommendation to Council in July16 2015. Meetings have been held with numerous outside public stakeholder groups including Chamber of Commerce, Northern Arizona University, largest 15 customers of the Utility, Northern Arizona Home Builders Association, Northern Arizona Realtors, Lions Club, and many other neighborhood civic groups. A public hearing notice was advertised in the 8/1/15 and 8/7/5 Arizona Daily Sun notifying customers of the proposed rate adjustment. being considered by the City. |
|||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
An alternative would be to choose not to implement any rate modifications. The ramifications of such action would be to reduce and eliminate capital improvements projects and upgrades for the utility system. This option would be to further delay Capital improvement such as pipe and treatment plant replacement projects. Consequently the Utilities Division would require larger increases in the future to catch up. Another option would be to phase in rate increases over a longer period of time. This may be done in many different was (length of time between rate increases). This is another option that is open to the City Council. |
|||||
Attachments: | Willdan Rate Study Presentation | ||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
14.B.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Public Hearing and Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2015-35: A resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona adopting the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan as a Minor Plan Amendment to the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 and establishing an effective date. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Hold Public Hearing
2) Read Resolution No.2015-35 by title only 3) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2015-35 by title only (if approved above) 4) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-35 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The intent of the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan is to provide a clear and comprehensive guide for compatible reinvestment that preserves and enhances the neighborhood character. Staff has worked closely with the neighborhood association, residents and property owners to find solutions to the challenges posed by regional transportation demands, entitlements in the Highway Commercial zone, and preservation of historic homes, affordable housing and neighborhood character. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend approval with conditions of the Specific Plan to the City Council on September 23, 2015. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Appendix 1 of the La Plaza Vieja neighborhood Specific Plan lists estimates for the cost of the highest priority implementation strategies (those that could be accomplished in the next 3-5 years). Some portion of the cost listed below will be covered by grants and the existing program of work. Adoption of the specific plan does not obligate city funds. Category and Approximate Costs Neighborhood Character - Not estimated, because most work could be completed as part of the City and LPVNA’s existing program of work. Parks - $55,000-85,000 for Old Town Springs and Plaza Vieja Park improvements Historic Preservation - $45,000 for a historic properties inventory plus $3,000-$15,000 for each individual landmark designation and preservation effort Transportation - $3.2-$3.5 million ($2.4 million is for the Florence-Walnut Underpass Project which is funded in the FY15-16 Capital Improvement Plan) |
|||||
Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan: | |||||
COUNCIL GOALS: 7) Address key issues and processes related to the implementation of the Regional Plan 8) Improve effectiveness of notification, communication, and engagement with residents, neighborhoods and businesses and about City services, programs, policies, projects and developments REGIONAL PLAN: Goal LU.4. Balance housing and employment land uses with the preservation and protection of our unique natural and cultural setting. Goal LU.10. Increase the proportion of urban neighborhoods to achieve walkable, compact growth. Goal NH.1. Foster and maintain healthy and diverse urban, suburban, and rural neighborhoods in the Flagstaff region. Goal T.4. Promote transportation infrastructure and services that enhance the quality of life of the communities within the region. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
There has not been a previous Council decision on this Specific Plan. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
The Planning and Zoning Commission placed one condition on the approval of the Specific Plan, based on feedback from a commercial property owner about the division of the planning area into Neighborhood Policy Areas. These policy areas are based on the Regional Plan framework of Commercial Core-Pedestrian shed-Neighborhood place types (p. 26-27). The Commission recommended modification of the boundary line between the Transition Area and Commercial Edge policy areas, and any modifications to policies necessary to support a new boundary. Planning and Development Services staff met with the property owner and the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association on October 1, 2015, and agreed on changes shown in the attached replacement pages with changes highlighted. Council may choose to adopt : 1) The La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Plan, as presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 23, 2015 (attachment 1) or 2) the La Plaza, Vieja Neighborhood Plan with proposed replacement pages (attachment 2). |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
The La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan (Specific Plan) is the first specific plan proposed since the 2005 Lone Tree Corridor Study was completed, and the first since the adoption of the Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 (FRP30). Work on the Plan began in 2008, and paused in 2012 to allow FRP30 work to be completed. In July 2014, the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association petitioned the City Council to pick up work on their neighborhood plan and bring it forward for adoption as soon as possible. | |||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
A key consideration in the decision to adopt the Specific Plan is whether or not the document presented will help the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission and staff make better decisions about land use and transportation issues in the planning area than if they were using the Flagstaff Regional Plan alone. Specific plans, like the Regional Plan are aspirational documents that do not alter existing property rights or entitlements. Their purpose is to help ensure consistent and thoughtful public policy, financial and land use decisions in the future. | |||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
Neighborhood residents, property owners and all of Flagstaff would benefit from the improved housing, connectivity, and the preservation of historic and cultural resources in the neighborhood. La Plaza Vieja’s vision would enhance growth and development of the area by: maintaining the architectural language of the existing buildings and environment; preserving a number of historical buildings; infilling vacant lots with appropriate buildings; honoring significant historical places, names and persons; enhancing the community’s culture by promoting a diverse population, housing choices, and community gathering space for children and adults; promoting local economic growth that nurtures local businesses and employs neighborhood residents; and provides safe and beautiful streets for pedestrians, bicycles and cars within the neighborhood and connecting to adjacent neighborhoods. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Development of the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan incorporates all levels of public participation: INFORM- the public notification and advertising for the project was extensive and included phone calls and door-to-door visits by the neighborhood association and City staff. CONSULT- the City held a 60 day public review to gather feedback on the draft of the plan before public hearings began. INVOLVE- Public concerns were carefully tracked and their consideration is included in the Public Participation Report to ensure transparency. COLLABORATE- members of the public and residents and property owners in the neighborhood were involved in directly drafting and finalizing goals and policies in the Specific Plan through workshops, meetings and public hearings. EMPOWER- the La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Association is empowered to pursue grants and partnership that facilitate the implementation of the Specific Plan once it is adopted. |
|||||
Attachments: | La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan as presented at the Planning and Zoning commission Public Hearing. | ||||
La Plaza Vieja Neighborhood Specific Plan with changes to Neighborhood Policy Areas | |||||
Res 2015-35 | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
17.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Evans to place on a future agenda discussion of Downtown Disability Parking. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Councilmember Evans has requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there are three councilmembers interested in placing it on a future agenda. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
None | |||||
Attachments: | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
17.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Putzova to place on a future agenda discussion and possible action regarding Indigenous People. | |||||
RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Councilmember Putzova has requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there are three councilmembers interested in placing it on a future agenda. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
None | |||||
Attachments: | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||
Minutes Attachments | |||||
No file(s) attached. | |||||