DRAFT AGENDA
4:30 P.M. MEETING
Individual Items on the 4:30 p.m. meeting agenda may be postponed to the 6:00 p.m. meeting.
|
1. | CALL TO ORDER
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).
|
||||||||
2. | ROLL CALL
|
||||||||
3. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MISSION STATEMENT
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Flagstaff is to protect and enhance the quality of life for all.
|
||||||||
4. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak. |
||||||||
5. | PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS | ||||||||
A. | Recognition: Voluntary Environmental Stewardship Program ADEQ Recognition of Cinder Lake Landfill | ||||||||
B. | Recognition: Finance Section’s 25th Consecutive Year of Receiving the GFOA Budget and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Awards | ||||||||
C. | Recognition: ARFF Joel Barnett Recognition | ||||||||
6. | APPOINTMENTS Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for the purpose of discussing or considering employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee, or employee of any public body...., pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1). |
||||||||
A. | Consideration of Appointments: Sustainability Commission. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Make three appointments to terms expiring October 2022.
|
|||||||||
7. | CONSENT ITEMS
All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items.
|
||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Final Plat Request from Vintage Partners, for the subdivision of 18.11 acres known as Mill Town Mixed-Use into two lots, two tracts, and public right-of-way within the Highway Commercial (HC) zone. (PZ-16-00239-07, Mill Town Mixed-Use Final Plat) | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Staff recommends approving the final plat with no conditions and authorizing the Mayor to sign both the plat and City/Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that the documents are ready for recording.
|
|||||||||
8. | ROUTINE ITEMS | ||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Environmental Professional Services Contract: Rio de Flag Flood Control Project Environmental Investigation Services. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
B. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: City of Flagstaff Municipal Court Facility Project - Award of Amendment #3 to the Design-Build Services Agreement 2018-63. This amendment contains the Guaranteed Maximum Price #3 agreement for completion of construction. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
RECESS 6:00 P.M.
RECONVENE |
|||||||||
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3).
|
|||||||||
9. | ROLL CALL
|
||||||||
10. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE | ||||||||
11. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION | ||||||||
12. | CARRY OVER ITEMS FROM THE 4:30 P.M. AGENDA | ||||||||
13. | REGULAR AGENDA | ||||||||
A. |
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-60: A resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Flagstaff and Coconino County for the acceptance of household and small business hazardous wastes at the City's Hazardous Products Center. |
||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2019-60 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2019-60 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-60 |
|||||||||
B. | Consideration of and Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-52: Approve the designation of an applicant agent and authorizing the agent to apply for and sign on behalf of the City of Flagstaff for the receipt of funds from the Arizona Division of Emergency Management and Military Affairs Public Assistance Program. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2019-52 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2019-52 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-52 |
|||||||||
C. | Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-58: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council, approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Summit Fire and Medical District; the Highlands Fire District; and the City of Flagstaff to participate in automatic aid. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2019-58 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2019-58 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-58 |
|||||||||
14. | DISCUSSION ITEMS | ||||||||
A. | Update and Review: Flagstaff Trails Initiative and Draft Regional Strategy | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Provide an update on Flagstaff Trails Iniative (FTI) and discuss the Draft Regional Trail Strategy and trail plan.
|
|||||||||
B. | Discussion: Water Conservation Strategic Plan Draft | ||||||||
C. | Discussion and Possible Direction: 2020 August Election Update | ||||||||
15. | COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
|
||||||||
16. | FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS After discussion and upon agreement by three members of the Council, an item will be moved to a regularly-scheduled Council meeting. |
||||||||
A. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Mayor Evans to place on a future agenda a discussion about a multi-government cultural tourism campaign between Flagstaff and the Navajo, Hopi, and Havasupai Tribes. | ||||||||
A. | Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Salas to have a Work Session discussion with the Arizona Commerce Authority to learn more and pursue possibilities and opportunities on economic development and housing on Flagstaff's opportunity zones. | ||||||||
17. | INFORMATIONAL ITEMS AND REPORTS FROM COUNCIL AND STAFF, FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS | ||||||||
18. | ADJOURNMENT | ||||||||
|
6.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Sustainability Commission. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make three appointments to terms expiring October 2022.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Sustainability Commission consists of seven citizens and is responsible for recommending and coordinating activities in concert with the City of Flagstaff Sustainability Program. To accomplish this objective, the Commission will address the social, economic, and environmental considerations of meeting the needs of current and future citizens. Among the Commission’s directives are the promotion of sustainable practices in all spheres of life and educating Flagstaff citizens. There are currently three seats available. It is important to fill vacancies on Boards and Commissions quickly so as to allow the Commission to continue meeting on a regular basis. There are eight applications on file for consideration by the Council, they are as follows:
COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT: Councilmember Aslan, Councilmember Salas, Councilmember Whelan |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
Not applicable. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint three Commissioners: By appointing one member at this time, the Sustainability Commission will be at full membership, allowing the group to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Postpone the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the openings by Board members and City staff has occurred, informing others of these vacancies through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | Sustainability Commission Authority |
7.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Final Plat Request from Vintage Partners, for the subdivision of 18.11 acres known as Mill Town Mixed-Use into two lots, two tracts, and public right-of-way within the Highway Commercial (HC) zone. (PZ-16-00239-07, Mill Town Mixed-Use Final Plat) | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Staff recommends approving the final plat with no conditions and authorizing the Mayor to sign both the plat and City/Subdivider Agreement when notified by staff that the documents are ready for recording.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
This is a request from Vintage Partners for Final Plat approval for two lots, two tracts, and right-of-way for the Beulah Boulevard extension and the University Avenue realignment. Please see sheet 1 of the Final Plat for a vicinity map. *** The Final Plat for Milltown will be included in the final packet distributed to Council next week.*** |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Financial impacts are outlined in the accompanying Development Agreement. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
There are no policy impacts affiliated with this Final Plat. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: | |||||
Council Goals Transportation and Other Public Infrastructure - Deliver quality community assets and continue to advocate and implement a highly performing multi-modal transportation system. Team Flagstaff Goals Strategic priority #3: Foster a resilient and economically prosperous city. Regional Plan Staff identified the relevant Regional Plan Goals and Policies that could be applied to support or not support the proposed Final Plat in association with the Direct to Ordinance Zoning Map Amendment. A list of those Goals and Policies, as well as a discussion and analysis, is provided in the Zoning Map Amendment staff report. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
City Council approved a Zoning Map Amendment, a Development Agreement, and a Preliminary Plat on April 17, 2018. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1. Approve the Final Plat with no conditions. 2. Approve the Final Plat with added conditions necessary to ensure compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat, the Zoning code, the Subdivision Code, and/or the Engineering Design Standards and Specifications for New Infrastructure. 3. Deny the Final Plat based on non-compliance with the approved Preliminary Plat, the Zoning code, the Subdivision Code, and/or the Engineering Design Standards and Specifications for New Infrastructure. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Community benefits and considerations are explained in detail in the attached Planning and Zoning Commission report dated February 6, 2018. | |||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Inform. No public hearings or public outreach are required by either the Zoning Code or the Subdivision Code as part of a final plat subdivision review process. Outreach was conducted in conjunction with the Zoning Map Amendment for this site. | |||||
Attachments: | Mill Town Final Plat Application | ||
Mill Town Development Agreement | |||
Mill Town Prelim Plat Report |
8.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Environmental Professional Services Contract: Rio de Flag Flood Control Project Environmental Investigation Services. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The Contract will be funded by the Rio de Flag Flood Control Stormwater Capital Improvements FY 2019-2020 account budget of $3,264,134. Account (206-08-385-3236-0). | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
No Impact
|
|||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: Council Goal 2017 – 2019 Transportation and Other Public Infrastructure - Deliver quality community assets and continue to advocate and implement a highly performing multi-modal transportation system. Council Goal 2017 - 2019 Environmental and Natural Resources - Actively manage and protect all environmental and natural resources. Regional Plan - Policy WR5 - Manage watersheds and stormwater to address flooding concerns, water quality, environmental protections, and rainwater harvesting. Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan - Foster a Resilient and Economically Prosperous City: Deliver outstanding services through a healthy environment, resources and infrastructure. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
The Rio de Flag Flood Control Project has been presented to City Council for various actions and decisions over the course of the project, including the City of Flagstaff/US Army Corps of Engineers Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA), engineering consultant services agreements, approval of fiscal year budgets, and Project updates. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1. Approve the Contract as recommended. Approval will allow SCS Engineers to investigate and categorize potential environmental contaminates on the Project site; or 2. Reject the award and provide additional direction to staff. This option would delay the environmental clearance activities. |
|||||
Background and History: | |||||
The Rio de Flag Flood Control Project has been under development as a cooperative project between the City of Flagstaff and the US Army Corps of Engineers since the early 2000s. The goal of the project is to remove the 100-year floodplain from the center of town, which will reduce flooding impacts in our community and improve citizen's quality of life and safety. The project has undergone extensive design, value engineering, and reporting efforts. Several of the project components have been constructed and are complete, including the Clay Wash Detention Basin, the Thorpe Bridge, and the Butler Tunnel. The project design is currently going through final completion. One of the items required for the final design is the certification of environmental clearances for all Project property. SCS Engineers will identify and quantify any existing contamination that will need to be removed. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff and the US Army Corps of Engineers executed the joint PCA in 2004. One of the primary responsibilities of the PCA is that the City must provide a construction corridor to the Army Corps' contractor that is clear of environmental contamination. SCS Engineers was hired by the City in April 2019 to develop and submit an environmental work plan to BNSF for site access and approval to conduct environmental investigations on their property. The work plan has been approved and the agencies are working through the final execution of the agreement. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The Contract will be funded by the Rio de Flag Flood Control Project Stormwater Capital Improvement account budget of $3,264,134 for FY 2019-2020. Account #206-08-385-3236-0. Pending the approval of City of Flagstaff Resolution No. 2019-55, the City will be eligible for participation in the 2019 Brownfield Coalition Assessment Grant, in partnership with the Northern Arizona Council of Governments. The Rio de Flag project will be investigated for eligibility of funding through this grant. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
This effort will identify and quantify potential environmental contaminants in the Rio de Flag Project area, which will then be removed from the community. The overall project provides many benefits to the community, including:
|
|||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
The Rio de Flag Flood Control Project has been included as a major element of the City’s Capital program and budget since 2004. The project has also been the subject of numerous Council Work Sessions, Friends of the Rio meetings, Project Public Meetings, Cityscape articles, and Arizona Daily Sun articles. | |||||
Attachments: | RDF env vicinity map | ||
City Cooperative Contract | |||
Scope of Work and Pricing | |||
State Contract |
8.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: City of Flagstaff Municipal Court Facility Project - Award of Amendment #3 to the Design-Build Services Agreement 2018-63. This amendment contains the Guaranteed Maximum Price #3 agreement for completion of construction. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The Project is currently budgeted in the amount of $17,242,427 for FY 2019-2020 and is anticipated to be budgeted in the amount of $2,243,963 for FY 2020-2021. Project funding is in the Capital Project Fund, Account Number 408-09-426-3278-1. The fiber optic infrastructure work will receive a funding contribution in the amount of $100,000 from Account 040-05-112-3043-6. |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
Award of Amendment #3, GMP #3 will allow KCS to continue with the construction of the Project as approved by Proposition 412 in the November 2016 ballot question. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: | |||||
Council Goal: Transportation and Other Public Infrastructure. Deliver quality community assets and continue to advocate and implement a highly performing multi-modal transportation system. Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030: Locating Facilities Goals and Policies. Goal PF.2. - Provide sustainable and equitable public facilities, services and infrastructure systems in an efficient and effective manner to serve all population areas and demographics. Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: Foster a Resilient and Economically Prosperous City. Deliver outstanding service through a healthy environment, resources and infrastructure. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
On June 14, 2016, Council reviewed funding options for the Project and directed staff to prepare ballot language for a $12M bond project to be funded through secondary property tax. On July 3, 2018, City Council awarded the Design-Build Contract #2018-63 to KCS for design phase services of the project. On March 5, 2019, City Council approved the GMP #1 Amendment to the original Design-Build Contract #2018-63. On May 21, 2019, City Council approved the GMP #2 Amendment to the original Design-Build Contract #2018-63. |
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1. Approve the Design-Build Services Amendment #3 GMP #3 to KCS as presented. 2. Reject the Design-Build Services Amendment #3 GMP #3 and direct staff to re-negotiate the terms and fee structure with KCS. |
|||||
Background and History: | |||||
The physical condition of the existing City Court building located at 15 North Beaver Street had deteriorated to a point where significant financial resources would be needed to remediate, remodel and stabilize the structure. In addition, the need exists for current and future space to ensure continued operational viability. On July 5, 2016, staff came before Council with the Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2016-27. This Resolution allowed Council to adopt an official ballot question to be submitted to qualified electors of the City of Flagstaff. This ballot question asked the citizens of Flagstaff to approve a temporary increase in the City’s secondary property tax and authorize the sale and issuance of bonds for purposes of constructing a new Municipal Court Facility. Council adopted the Resolution and the question was placed on the ballot for the election of November 08, 2016. The ballot question was approved. On April 1, 2018, the City advertised a Request for Statement of Qualifications from Arizona Registered Contractors for the qualification-based selection of a Design-Build team to provide design and construction services for the Project. The City received eight responses to the Request for Statements of Qualifications. A five-person committee was formed to evaluate the Statements of Qualifications and the committee selected 3 firms for interviews. Upon the completion of the interviews, the committee selected KCS as the most qualified Design-Builder to perform the work. On July 3, 2018, City Council awarded the Design-Build contract to KCS, in the amount of $1,593,628 for design phase services. The design team completed the programming and developed the facility design in cooperation with Courts Administration, the City Prosecutor's Office, Flagstaff Police Department, City Manager's Office, and City Planning. On March 5, 2019, City Council awarded the GMP #1 Amendment to the original contract for hazardous waste abatement, demolition and site work in the amount of $1,518,175. On May 21, 2019, City Council awarded the GMP #2 Amendment to the original contract for the facility construction in the amount of $15,557,094. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The Project will be located on property owned by the City located at 101 W. Cherry Avenue. The existing buildings at this location have been demolished and removed in compliance with the GMP #1 amendment and project construction has begun in compliance with the GMP #2 amendment. To meet City of Flagstaff Zoning Code-Title 10, parking capacity requirements, the existing City Court located at 15 N. Beaver Street and the City Prosecutor’s Offices located at 107 W. Aspen Avenue will be demolished to provide patron and staff parking. The Project was designed to provide secure staff parking. The facility design includes several components to support sustainability and the City's Climate Action Plan, including:
|
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
Total funding for the Project is as follows: Prop 412 Voter-Approved Courts Project Funding Bonds $12,000,000 **Identified Funding (Courts Fees) $ 7,500,000 Total $ 19,500,000 **Identified Funding Court Fees $2,080,000 Sale of Fire Station #1 $ 520,000 Re-development Fund $ 500,000 Capital Funding Transfer $ 400,000 Capital Financing $4,000,000 Total $7,500,000 Future public parking associated with the 2016 bond language is funded in the amount of $2,000,000 through the sale or development of the existing Court Facility lots. In addition to the bond and identified funding, additional funding in the amount of $379,505 was designated for the facility in the FY 2020 budget from Police Department salary savings, debt service savings, and interest earnings credit. The fiber optic infrastructure work will receive a funding contribution in the amount of $100,000 from Account 040-05-112-3043-6 because this infrastructure will provide benefits for the city-wide traffic signal interconnect program. A Contractor's contingency of 5% in the amount of $19,230 and an Owner's contingency of 4.89% in the amount of $25,451 are included in this contract. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The Project will provide a safe and efficient municipal building that will greatly improve the Court's operations now and into the future, enhance the staff and user experience, and provide an attractive amenity to downtown Flagstaff. | |||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
There have been multiple Council meetings to discuss the Project over the course of the last three years, in addition to multiple public meetings prior to the ballot question of 2016. A Public Meeting was held on February 20, 2019, to engage the public on the Project design. | |||||
Attachments: | Court GMP 3 | ||
Court Context Map | |||
Court Vicinity Map | |||
Court DB GMP1 GMP2 Contracts | |||
Contingency Justification Form | |||
Court PPT GMP3 |
13.A.
| |||||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-60: A resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Flagstaff and Coconino County for the acceptance of household and small business hazardous wastes at the City's Hazardous Products Center. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2019-60 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2019-60 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-60 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
This Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City of Flagstaff and Coconino County will allow the City of Flagstaff to accept hazardous waste at the Hazardous Products Center (HPC) at Cinder Lakes Landfill without direct payment from households and small businesses within Coconino County. This IGA provides Coconino County with a hazardous waste disposal option available to all County households and qualifying small businesses, based on quantities of hazardous material generated, which promotes preventing these hazardous materials from being dumped or disposed of inappropriately and in inappropriate locations throughout our forested communities. Under the IGA, the City will receive a $50,000 flat fee per fiscal year. Additionally, given the proximity of the Cinder Lakes Landfill to existing County road inventory, the Coconino County Public Works Department will plow the road to the Cinder Lake Landfill to access the HPC during winter storm events and on an "as needed" basis. Further, the County has proposed a contribution of $1.68 million dollars regarding the reconstruction and "Turnback" (i.e. transfer of responsibility) of the Landfill Road as described in the attached letter. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
While anticipated costs to the City for the operation of the HPC are expected to remain similar to recent fiscal year costs, and the Coconino County portion of the hazardous wastes received at the HPC are anticipated to remain steady, this agreement is for a flat fee from the Coconino County to the City of Flagstaff of $50,000 per year for the ten (10)-year period of the IGA. Last fiscal year (FY2018-2019), Coconino County was invoiced a total of approximately $114,383 for use of the HPC. Coconino County is proposing to contribute $1.68 million to the reconstruction and Turnback of Landfill Road, which provides the only commercial and public access point to the Landfill. The roadway is in significant need of repair and realignment in some safety zones, to provide a long term viable and safe access point to the City's Landfill and the HPC. While the details of this contribution and financial agreement with Coconino County have not been completely formalized in the form of an agreement, the City has assurances from Coconino County for the contributions to the roadway reconstruction Turnback and that the funding has been budgeted for the project by Coconino County. The Landfill is a major asset to all City and Coconino County residents and both organizations remain committed to the Landfill and HPC viability. If all terms and conditions are not met by the Coconino County with this IGA for Coconino County residents and small businesses to utilize the HPC, the City can terminate the IGA with a sixty (60)-day written notice. |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
N/A | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan: | |||||
Actively manage and protect all environmental resources by diverting hazardous material from the Landfill, forests and waterways. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
There have been various versions of agreements authorizing use of the HPC by Coconino County residents and businesses since it opened in October 2002. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1. Authorize the Intergovernmental Agreement with Coconino County; or 2. Reject authorization of the Intergovernmental Agreement with Coconino County; however, this would result in a lack of disposal options for residential and small business hazardous wastes in northern Arizona. |
|||||
Background and History: | |||||
The City’s HPC opened in October 2002 and has been accepting and invoicing Coconino County for hazardous wastes from households in Coconino County since that time. Small businesses within Coconino County have been allowed to use the HPC since 2007. Businesses pay for the disposal of their hazardous wastes. | |||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Under the terms of the ten (10) year IGA, Coconino County agrees to pay the City a flat fee of $50,000 for use of the HPC. Coconino County will plow the access road to the Center on an “as needed” basis. In return, the City shall permit households and small businesses within the County to dispose of hazardous wastes at the Center. | |||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
N/A | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The City benefits when there are increased disposal options for hazardous wastes in Northern Arizona which reduces the potential disposal of hazardous wastes to the environment. | |||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
N/A | |||||
Attachments: | Res. 2019-60 | ||
IGA Document | |||
Landfill Letter |
13.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of and Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-52: Approve the designation of an applicant agent and authorizing the agent to apply for and sign on behalf of the City of Flagstaff for the receipt of funds from the Arizona Division of Emergency Management and Military Affairs Public Assistance Program. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2019-52 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2019-52 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-52 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Designate Applicant Agent and Primary Point of Contact for the Arizona Department of Emergency Management and Military Affairs Public Assistance Program. - Designate Greg Clifton, City Manager as the Applicant Agent - Designate Stacey Brechler-Knaggs, Grants and Contracts Manager/Public Assistance Recovery Manager as the Primary Point of Contact |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
When a disaster occurs, the City of Flagstaff is to respond, recover from the impact, and mitigate future damages. The Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) and the Arizona Division of Emergency Management and Military Affairs (ADEMA) provide recovery funding through its Public Assistance Program. The program provides assistance for Debris Removal, Emergency Protective Measures, Roads and Bridges, Water Control Facilities, Buildings and Equipment, Utilities, and Parks, Recreational Facilities and Other Items. The Public Assistance Program provides for a Federal declaration, 75% Federal Share, 15% State Share, and 10% City Share and for a State declaration, 75% State Share and 25% City Share. |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: | |||||
Regional Plan - Public Buildings, Services, Facilities, & Safety Public Safety - Goal PF.3. Provide high-quality emergency response and public safety services including law enforcement, fire, medical, and ambulance transport service. |
|||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Yes, on November 16, 2010. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
- Approve the Designated Applicant Agent and Primary Point of Contact. - Not Approve the Designated Applicant Agent and Primary Point of Contact which will risk emergency funding. |
|||||
Background and History: | |||||
The Public Assistance Program provides support to state agencies and political subdivisions of the State in repairing damaged public infrastructure when recovering from any State-declared disaster. The Governor may proclaim a state of emergency after a political subdivision(s) has passed a resolution stating that an emergency exists within their jurisdiction(s) AND have been able to demonstrate that the incident is above and beyond their capability to recover from without assistance from the State. Through a proclamation, the Governor may provide Public Assistance to the affected Political Subdivision(s) of the state (counties, cities, towns, state agencies). Public Assistance is provided through the Governor’s Emergency Fund which is allocated $4 million dollars annually to cover the costs of emergencies and disasters. Emergency Management's Grant Administration administers this fund. When a disaster is beyond the capability of the State and local governments, the Governor will request federal assistance from FEMA through the President of the United States. The recovery process for a single event is not complete until all work has been completed, inspected, documentation audited and final payment disbursed. Once the recovery process for a single event is complete the declared disaster is terminated. | |||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff is legally responsible for the performance of emergency services and for the repair of damaged public infrastructure during and following a disaster. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The Public Assistance Program provides much-needed financial assistance following a disaster to help restore a sense of normalcy to our community. | |||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
This action is required by the Arizona Department of Emergency Management and Military Affairs. | |||||
Attachments: | Res. 2019-52 | ||
Designation of Applicant Agent Form |
13.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2019-58: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council, approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Summit Fire and Medical District; the Highlands Fire District; and the City of Flagstaff to participate in automatic aid. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2019-58 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2019-58 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2019-58 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The participants of this intergovernmental agreement (IGA) create an automatic aid consortium whereupon the participants agree to act as one operational entity for the purpose of improved fire/rescue/emergency medical services and improved firefighter safety. Automatic aid is the most advanced and effective form of mutual aid whereupon improved levels of service and capacity are achieved by all the participating agencies. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
None. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
No policy impacts. | |||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan: | |||||
Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan 2017
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
City Council has entered into cooperative agreements and mutual aid agreements in the past, however, the City Council has not previously considered automatic aid. | |||||
Background and History: | |||||
The participants of this automatic aid IGA agree to operationally act as one agency for the purpose of improved fire/rescue/emergency medical services. The basis of the agreement is that the closest most appropriate fire service resource will be dispatched regardless of jurisdictional boundaries. Automatic Aid is often cited as the gold standard for an emergency service delivery model. The model provides added value for smaller and larger agencies. Larger agencies such as Flagstaff benefit by having additional units capable of responding to multiple single unit responses that occur in the City. The smaller agencies Highlands and Summit benefit by having additional units capable of responding to large incidents that occur in their districts. When an emergency occurs in the "system" (Flagstaff Highlands Summit Jurisdictions), the firefighter paramedics that are closest to the emergency will respond to provide service, regardless of jurisdiction. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
For automatic aid to be successful, the following key elements should be in place to ensure the best service and highest margins of safety for firefighters:
|
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
ISO (Insurance Services Office) ISO’s Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS), evaluates four primary categories of fire suppression — fire department, emergency communications, water supply, and community risk reduction. The FSRS includes standards set by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). A community’s investment in fire mitigation is a proven and reliable predicator of future fire losses. Insurance companies use PPC information to help establish fair premiums for fire insurance — generally offering lower premiums in communities with better protection. By offering economic benefits for communities that invest in their firefighting services, the program provides an additional incentive for improving and maintaining public fire protection. |
|||||
Expanded Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Inform | |||||
Attachments: | Res. 2019-58 | ||
IGA AA |
14.A.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
TITLE: | |||||
Update and Review: Flagstaff Trails Initiative and Draft Regional Strategy | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Provide an update on Flagstaff Trails Iniative (FTI) and discuss the Draft Regional Trail Strategy and trail plan.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
In August 2017, a collaboration of local agencies – the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Coconino National Forest, Flagstaff Area National Monuments, and Flagstaff Biking Organization – received a grant for planning assistance via the National Park Service's Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program to support a multi-agency regional trail planning process referred to as the Flagstaff Trails Initiative (FTI). The group of core collaborators has since expanded to include Coconino Trail Riders, Sierra Club, American Conservation Experience, R2R Hiking, and others. The purpose of FTI is to develop and implement a collaborative, cross-jurisdictional strategy for recreational trails in the Flagstaff region. This effort seeks to improve the quality, connectivity and community support for a sustainable trail system that balances the demand for recreation with the community’s vision for conservation, development, and health. The overall goal is to elevate Flagstaff's trails from good to extraordinary. The project has reached an important juncture with the release of the Draft Flagstaff Regional Trail Strategy after two years of public engagement and collaboration. The core team has been meeting since 2017 working on the following activities;
The staff presentation will be attached to the staff summary with the final agenda.
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
|
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
Support and participation in of the FTI published 10 distinct goals and 30+ proposed strategies, such as:
|
|||||
Connection to Council Goal, Regional Plan and/or Team Flagstaff Strategic Plan: | |||||
Council Goals: Actively manage and protect all environmental and natural resources. Regional Plan: Goal REC.1. Maintain and grow the region’s healthy system of convenient and accessible parks, recreation facilities, and trails. Policy Rec.1.2. Promote public and private partnerships to offer parks, recreation facilities, and resources. Policy Rec.1.3. Coordinate City, County, and Forest Service recreational planning to best serve the community. Policy Rec.1.4. Design new or updated public facilities to include parks, open space, and/or recreational opportunities where feasible. Policy Rec.1.5. Incorporate sustainable building and maintenance technologies and universal design into parks and recreation facilities. Goal OS.1. The region has a system of open lands, such as undeveloped natural areas, wildlife corridors and habitat areas, trails, access to public lands, and greenways to support the natural environment that sustains our quality of life, cultural heritage, and ecosystem health. Goal LU.3. Continue to enhance the region’s unique sense of place within the urban, suburban, and rural context (Policy LU.3.3). Goal ED.7. Continue to promote and enhance Flagstaff’s unique sense of place as an economic driver. TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE: Deliver quality community assets and continue to advocate and implement a highly performing multi-modal transportation system. |
|||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
On February 26, 2018 staff presented about the Flagstaff Trails Initiative | |||||
Background and History: | |||||
Trails and access to open space and the forest help make Flagstaff a better place to live and visit. They contribute to the quality of life, wellness, and economic development of our community by providing opportunities for residents and visitors to recreate within and experience our natural environment. The City, Coconino National Forest, Coconino County, and Flagstaff Area National Monuments collectively manage more than 350 miles of non-motorized recreational and commuter trails, including FUTS and single-track trails, in the region. Flagstaff’s trails receive a significant amount of use from residents and visitors and are one of our most prominent community assets. Unfortunately, there are relatively few dedicated resources available for trail construction, stewardship or maintenance. Every regional plan for the Flagstaff area – including City, County, and National Forest plans – identify trails as an important community asset that should be enhanced. However, there has not been a holistic and strategic effort specifically to address trails planning for nearly 20 years. The FTI provides an inclusive process to assess Flagstaff’s existing trail system and plan for improvements. The contents of the Draft Flagstaff Regional Trail Strategy were developed through a full consensus decision making model. The Strategy outlines a vision for the future of the trail system around Flagstaff and identified nearly 100 trail connections, new trails and access facilities throughout the region on land managed by the City, County and US Forest Service. The recommendations were developed through an extensive, citizen-driven collaborative process that included considered. These recommendations are prioritized regionally to allow for coordination in funding and implementation. Additionally, the strategy outlines an approach to address the challenging financial situation surrounding recreational trails. A new Flagstaff Trails Initiative 501c3 nonprofit that is focused on raising resources and an interagency financial agreement are key elements of this approach. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Trails are part of what make Flagstaff what it is – a place that embraces its extraordinary setting on the Colorado Plateau. Trail providers, users, and other stakeholders have come together to make sure that the Flagstaff trail system is not just good, but incredible. The project has experienced enthusiastic public participation. The Initiative has taken a holistic approach that balances recreational demand with environmental quality considerations. Each recommended project requires additional planning, environmental analysis and on-the-ground design to ensure the projects are appropriate given the area’s cultural and natural resources and recreational uses. Inclusion on this list does imply formal approval for any of the individual projects. Instead, the list of recommendations represents the view of FTI partners on where the region should move next as a trail community. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
This project will focus on non-motorized and motorized trails inside the boundary of the Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization, which extends from Bellemont to the west, Winona to the east, Sunset Crater to the north and Mountainaire to the south. It includes trails managed by the City of Flagstaff, Coconino National Forest, National Park Service and Coconino County. Our trails give us something fun to do with our time. They make us healthy and strong. They generate connections to nature. They create business opportunities. They improve our mental health. They give our kids places to run around. They draw visitors, who spend money and generate jobs. They help us get to work. They help us better understand our environment. They let us test ourselves. They limit environmental impact. |
|||||
Attachments: |
14.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Discussion: Water Conservation Strategic Plan Draft | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Water Conservation staff are seeking direction and input from City Council on the Draft Strategic Plan that contains a proposed program change, known as “Optimized Conservation Program”. If implemented, this new program would provide the best return on investment for conservation dollars spent, save the city money by avoiding future water production/new supply costs and accomplishes the Council’s goal of being a leader in water conservation. This new proposed program would also position the City of Flagstaff to receive a higher level of recognition of water conservation through the Alliance for Water Efficiency’s G480 Standard and Leaderboard.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
In 2016 City Council gave staff direction to develop an innovative Water Conservation plan, which was funded in FY18. The plan aims to find the balance of investment in water savings that can be achieved through conservation programming with offsetting more costly water supplies and infrastructure. The Water Conservation Program has been working with Maddaus Water Management (MWM) on a Water Conservation Strategic Plan. The Plan provides an assessment of current and future water conservation actions in order to ensure that conservation dollars and staff time are invested in strategies that provide the best return on investment and coverage of all sectors of the Flagstaff customer base. To this end, all current Water Conservation Program activities were assessed for return on investment using MWM’s quantitative cost-benefit computational model. In addition, the Water Conservation staff worked with community stakeholders to select ten additional conservation strategies that the program could consider for the future. These additional activities were also processed through the model. After considering several combinations of current and future conservation activities, the Water Conservation Program and MWM compiled a selection that provided both good returns on investment and coverage of all customer classes. MWM is recommending proposed changes to the Water Conservation Program, known as the Optimized Conservation Program. If implemented, this new program would provide the best return on investment for conservation dollars spent, save the city money by avoiding future water production/new supply costs and accomplishes the Council’s goal of being a leader in water conservation. |
|||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
In 2016, the Water Resources & Conservation Section collaborated with the Sustainability Section to propose reframing the Water Conservation Program in order to transform Flagstaff into a water-wise leader. One proposed output of this collaboration was the development of an innovative water efficiency plan to guide both the City and the Community. In many cases, water conservation can be a community’s most economical water source. In fact, the current conservation program has been successful in delaying the need for an additional water supply for at least four years, which has provided significant financial savings for the City of Flagstaff. To continue to develop and advance these gains, the City Council awarded funds in FY18 to create a Water Conservation Strategic Plan to assess and improve the Water Conservation Program in order to meet the following goals:
An important aspect of the strategic planning process was the inclusion of stakeholder collaboration during all essential planning stages. Public participation included representatives from local nonprofits (ex: Sierra Club, Terra BIRDS, Master Gardeners), neighborhood associations (ex: Southside, La Plaza Vieja), commercial interests (ex: Warner’s, Flagstaff Lodging, Restaurant, and Tourism Association), and also members of the general public. Engagement opportunities included general outreach at the 2018 and 2019 Flagstaff Festival of Science, routine engagement with our Water Conservation Strategic Plan Advisory Committee, the selection and consultation of a broader stakeholder group, and an online survey. These interactions provided us with invaluable assistance in the process of narrowing down the original list of potential conservation actions, along with insight on the customization of these actions for best application in the Flagstaff community. In addition, the stakeholder groups provided feedback on the Optimized Conservation Program and on water conservation in Flagstaff from a broader lens. After the first several rounds of stakeholder collaboration, staff from COF and MWM evaluated current conservation activities using the model. This initial assessment indicated that there was room to improve the return on investment in the current conservation program initiatives (cost-benefit analysis score was 0.88, and should ideally be close to 1.0). As an example, two initiatives that were selected for improvement were the current rainwater container and toilet rebate programs. The toilet rebate program can be optimized by only incentivizing more efficient toilets with efficiencies that exceed the local code of 1.28 gallons per flush and by lowering the total rebate amount provided and the rainwater container measure can be absorbed into general outreach activities while reducing staff time investment by forging community partnerships. Along with modeling the current conservation program activities, conservation staff and MWM also modeled 10 activities to be considered in the future, which were selected with assistance from the community stakeholder groups. When building the Optimized Conservation Program, staff and MWM considered both returns on investment and coverage of community customer categories. The new actions that were selected included Smart metering, outdoor water budgeting, school retrofits, and two code proposals: a revision of the landscaping code and a new code to require EPA WaterSense approved toilets, showerheads and faucets in new developments in the City of Flagstaff. These new actions, when added to the current conservation programming, improved the cost-benefit analysis score from 0.88 to 0.98. Supplementary details about these additions to the conservation program are as follows:
An additional benefit of the Optimized Conservation Program is better alignment with the requirements for the American Water Works Association G480 Standard, which describes the critical elements of establishing, implementing, and evaluating an effective water conservation program. Meeting this standard allows a water utility to apply for recognition through the Alliance for Water Efficiency’s Leaderboard, which is a nationally recognized standard for excellence in water conservation. Achieving recognition through this certification would improve Flagstaff’s standing as a national leader in water conservation. For these reasons, Water Conservation staff are recommending adopting the Water Conservation Strategic Plan draft, with the selection of the Optimized Conservation Program as a workplan for the Water Conservation Program. The additional initiatives included in the optimized program will require an additional investment of $45,000 annually, assuming all new initiatives are implemented at once. Of this investment, approximately $15,000 would be directed toward additional staffing, either through the addition of one more part-time employee or through converting existing part-time funds and these additional funds into the creation of one more full-time conservation employee. It is important to note that several of the proposed additions to the conservation program would require time and investment from other areas of municipal organization. For example, to fully utilize and benefit from the new Smart meters that are getting installed across the Flagstaff community, the conservation program will need buy-in and cooperation from the customer service team to troubleshoot issues with data collection from the meters. Currently, data is only collected once a month, and only the total sum of usage from the month period is recorded. To receive the full benefits of these meters, more frequent data access is necessary, as is more detailed data from the meter itself. Conservation-oriented behavior-change is improved if real-time water use data is available to the customers. Another example would be the two code revisions proposed. Water Conservation staff will need assistance from personnel in Community Development (planning and inspections) to draft the necessary code and to ensure compliance with the same. These investments from other areas of the organization are not accounted for in terms of the additional budget requested for the Optimized Conservation Program, though there are rough estimates for the total hours needed in the computational model. Next steps for the Water Conservation Strategic Plan (following council discussion) include the adoption of the final plan by the City Council and the creation of an implementation strategy by Water Conservation staff. The FY21 budget process would include the initial stages of this implementation strategy. |
|||||
Attachments: | Presentation |
14.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Discussion and Possible Direction: 2020 August Election Update | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Discussion and direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Earlier this year staff reported that an election to authorize an adjustment to the City's permanent base expenditure limitation could only be done at a November election of even-numbered years. It has been determined that this type of election can be held at the August primary election. Staff wanted to notify the Council of this opportunity and share that it is our desire to place a question on the August 2020 ballot seeking authorization from the voters to increase the City's base expenditure limitation. There are statutory deadlines associated with a base expenditure limitation adjustment, the first of which occurs in March 2020. It is important for staff to begin preparing for this deadline should Council wish to move forward with the ballot question. **A PowerPoint Presentation will be included in the Final Agenda** |
|||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
The educational outreach for an expenditure limitation adjustment can be significant and the benefit to having the adjustment on the August ballot is that there are not a number of other issues that also require similar outreach. UniSource has also requested a franchise election in August 2020 to seek voter approval for the renewal of their existing franchise agreement which is set to expire in October 2020. The renewal of the franchise agreement will allow UniSource to continue operations within the City of Flagstaff. It is also a possibility that there will need to be a Primary Election in August. The need for a Primary Election will not be known until the first part of April. This is not a request to call the August election. Should Council provide direction to move forward with the August election for an expenditure limitation increase, a request to call the election will happen in April 2020. There is a financial component associated with adding a City question or Primary election to the August ballot along with the franchise question. Per state law, UniSource is responsible for the cost of conducting a franchise election, should the City need a Primary election or choose to add the expenditure limitation adjustment, the cost of the election would then be shared between the City and UniSource, this would reduce the financial impact of holding a City only election. Expenditure limitations for cities and other governmental agencies were established by legislation in 1980. The City of Flagstaff has received 2 permanent base adjustments. One when the BBB tax was approved by the voters in 1988 and the 2nd in 2006. The alternative to Expenditure Limitation is Alternative Expenditure Control or Home Rule that requires municipalities to receive voter approval every 4 years. In accordance with ARS 41-1279.07(H), a city or town that exceeds its expenditure limitation without authorization will have the following amount of State income tax (urban revenue sharing monies) withheld based on the percentage of the excess expenditures:
The last expenditure limitation was in May 2006. Voters approved a permanent base adjustment of $25M due to:
|
|||||
Attachments: |
16.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Mayor Evans to place on a future agenda a discussion about a multi-government cultural tourism campaign between Flagstaff and the Navajo, Hopi, and Havasupai Tribes. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Mayor Evans has requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there are two other members of Council interested in placing it on a future agenda. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
Attachments: |
16.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
TITLE | |||||
Future Agenda Item Request (F.A.I.R.): A request by Councilmember Salas to have a Work Session discussion with the Arizona Commerce Authority to learn more and pursue possibilities and opportunities on economic development and housing on Flagstaff's opportunity zones. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Council direction.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
Rule 4.01, Procedures for Preparation of Council Agendas, of the City of Flagstaff City Council Rules of Procedure outlines the process for bringing items forward to a future agenda. Councilmember Salas has requested this item be placed on an agenda under Future Agenda Item Requests (F.A.I.R.) to determine if there are two other members of Council interested in placing it on a future agenda. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
Attachments: |