City Council Meeting - DRAFT

Return to the Search Page Return to the Agenda

15.A.

Meeting Date:	04/07/2015
From:	Karl Eberhard, Comm Design & Redevelopment Mgr

Information

TITLE:

Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2015-02: A resolution of the Mayor and Council of the City of Flagstaff, Arizona adopting the Community Reinvestment Plan (Community Reinvestment Plan)

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1) Read Resolution No. 2015-02 by title only
2) Clerk reads Resolution No. 2015-02 by title only (if approved above)
3) Adopt Resolution No. 2015-02

Executive Summary:

The Community Reinvestment Plan presents an over-arching policy as well as objectives and potential actions to implement the policy. The development of the Plan involved talking to our customers, research of how other communities have approached this policy goal, a preliminary analysis (current activities, obvious basic legal challenges, and potential effectiveness), discussion with all affected City Divisions and Sections, and discussion with the City Council over the course of four years.

The adoption of this Plan establishes the Community Reinvestment Plan as a formal policy of the City. While the objectives and possible implementation strategies included in the Plan have survived the preliminary cut and merit further development, they remain “possibilities” that can be further evaluated and further shaped. A notable amount of work remains in developing the remaining possibilities. Staff will need to prepare specific actions, ordinances and other mechanisms, for future City Council consideration and possible adoption. The adoption of this plan thus provides direction to staff to include this work in their future budgeting and work programs.

Financial Impact:

Simply developing the implementation strategies has cost implications including staff time, hiring consultants, or additional staff. Projects potentially could experience delay as staff develops these strategies. Implementation strategies themselves have more significant costs associated with them with the more effective strategies generating higher costs. Funding allocations by the City Council are necessary to develop the options and more will again be necessary in the future for implementation.

Connection to Council Goal and/or Regional Plan:

COUNCIL GOALS:

7) Address key issues and processes related to the implementation of the Regional Plan

REGIONAL PLAN:

The Flagstaff Regional Plan 2030 includes a series of goals and policies that support community reinvestment as an objective. The goals and policies include less direct goals regarding community reinvestment such as preserving resources and open spaces, efficient infrastructure, energy efficiency, urban land-uses and development patterns, and multimodal commuting. However, the Regional Plan also directly calls for compact development, investing in existing neighborhoods and urban areas, adaptive re-use, historic preservation, and promoting infill and redevelopment.

Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This:

At a Regular Meeting on March 3, 2015, the City Council provided the most recent direction that serves as the basis of this draft of the Community Reinvestment Plan. Per the direction provided, the annotations of the Plan have been deleted and the text modified to include more flexible language for any possible City Council actions in the future.

Options and Alternatives:

1) Adopt Plan.
2) Do not adopt plan and provide staff with direction for continued development of the plan.
3) Do not adopt plan.

Background/History:

In 2010 at the direction of the City Council, staff initiated a community discussion about redevelopment and infill. The concept of "redevelopment and infill" was later expanded to "reinvestment" to be more inclusive of different types of redevelopment and to avoid cultural and legal connotations of the word "redevelopment". The City Council sought ways to motivate developers to reinvest in developed areas instead of investing in green fields. This process included citizens, City customers and internal stakeholders and it identified areas where our current policies and codes were unfavorable to reinvestment.

The next step involved researching how other communities have addressed this same concern. This was extensive research of municipal, county, state, and Federal efforts nationwide. This generated a "raw data" collection of ideas that did not evaluate success, legality, cost, or any other factors - simply identifying "What has been tried?" This list was then taken back out to the stakeholders for discussion. (In bullet form, the list is included in the October 2013 Staff Memo to the City Council.) These discussions allowed us to separate out the ideas into "could be done" (Green boxes on the list), those with "fatal flaws" (Red boxes), and those that required City Council direction (Yellow boxes).

In October of 2013, the items that required preliminary City Council direction were brought to a Work Session and discussed. The City Council provided direction that was then used to develop a Draft Community Reinvestment Plan. City staff then considered this complete list (green, yellow, and red) but also "thinned" the list of ideas and further refined the plan for City Council consideration. Presented for adoption on March 3, 2015, the City Council expressed a desire for the explanatory annotations to be deleted and for the text to be modified to include more flexible language for any possible City Council actions in the future.

Key Considerations:

See "Financial Impact".

Expanded Financial Considerations:

Detailed cost expectations can be provided as implementation strategies are brought before the City Council for consideration.

Community Benefits and Considerations:

Elimination of blight: A deteriorating area results in a negative image that affects economic vitality elsewhere in the community. This impacts not only tourism but also business attraction, retention, and expansion.

Prevention of urban sprawl and more compact use of infrastructure and more effective use of lands that may be vacant, underutilized or needing refresh.

Creation of new sources of tax revenue: Deteriorating areas cannot pay their own way and reinvestment puts non-producing or under-producing properties back on the tax rolls.

Not only does reinvestment provide retail in underserved areas, it also provides neighborhood jobs, thus reducing personal and municipal costs of commuting.

Reduction of pollution/environmental contamination: The re-use of buildings and infrastructure reduces materials in the landfill, consumption of raw materials, and the transportation costs associated with hauling out the old and hauling in the new.

Import substitution: A central strategy in building a sustainable local economy is import substitution – creating locally what otherwise would have to be purchased elsewhere. Almost by definition reinvestment is locally based, using expertise, labor, and materials from the local market. Often new construction is the opposite, requiring the importation of expertise, materials, and often labor from elsewhere.

Cultural preservation: Our sense of place, identity, evolution, ownership, and community. These are referred to as the Five Senses of Quality Communities and will, in the intermediate and long term, have considerable impact on the economic health of individual communities.

All of these benefits provide the citizens of Flagstaff with an improved quality of life.

Community Involvement:

Collaborate - See "Background" section above.

Expanded Options and Alternatives:

1. Adopt Plan.
2. Do not adopt plan and provide staff with direction for continued development of the plan. This option would allow the City Council to add or delete any materials or concepts that are or are not desired.
3. Do not adopt plan. This option would not provide any different policy for reinvestment than currently exists.

Attachments
Plan Document
Res 2015-02